Effective and Equitable Adoption of Opt-In Residential Dynamic Electricity Pricing

被引:61
作者
Borenstein, Severin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Haas Sch Business, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
Real-time pricing; Critical-peak pricing; Tariff design; TIME; EFFICIENCY; MARKETS;
D O I
10.1007/s11151-012-9367-3
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Time-varying retail electricity pricing is very popular with economists, but has little support among regulators and consumers. I propose an opt-in time-varying residential pricing plan that would be equitable to both customers who opt in and those who don't. Low-income households would, on average, see almost no change in their bills under time-varying pricing, while low-consumption households would see their bills decline somewhat and high-consumption households would see their bills rise. Most importantly, I show that the opt-in approach is unlikely to increase the flat rate charged to other customers by more than a few percentage points.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 160
页数:34
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Alexander B.R., 2010, The Electricity Journal, V23, P39, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.TEJ.2010.05.014
[2]  
American Association of Retired Persons, 2010, NEED ESS CONS PROT S
[3]  
Bonbright J. C., 1989, PRINCIPLES PUBLIC UT
[4]  
Borenstein S, 2005, RAND J ECON, V36, P469
[5]   The long-run efficiency of real-time electricity pricing [J].
Borenstein, S .
ENERGY JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (03) :93-116
[6]   The trouble with electricity markets: Understanding California's restructuring disaster [J].
Borenstein, S .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2002, 16 (01) :191-211
[7]   Measuring market inefficiencies in California's restructured wholesale electricity market [J].
Borenstein, S ;
Bushnell, JB ;
Wolak, FA .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2002, 92 (05) :1376-1405
[8]  
Borenstein S., 2007, 172 U CAL EN I CTR S
[9]  
Borenstein S., 2005, Electricity Deregulation: Choices and Challenges
[10]  
Borenstein S, 2007, ENERG J, V28, P131