Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of a single implant-supported zirconia framework and its effect on stress distribution in D4 (maxilla) and D2 (mandible) bone quality

被引:5
作者
Guven, Sedat [1 ]
Demirci, Fatih [1 ]
Yavuz, Izzet [2 ]
Atalay, Yusuf [3 ]
Ucan, Musa Can [4 ]
Asutay, Fatih [3 ]
Altintas, Eyyup [5 ]
机构
[1] Dicle Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Diyarbakir, Turkey
[2] Dicle Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Pediat Dent, Diyarbakir, Turkey
[3] Afyon Kocatepe Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Fac Dent, Afyon, Turkey
[4] Dicle Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Fac Dent, Diyarbakir, Turkey
[5] Elazig Oral & Dent Hlth Ctr, Dept Prosthodont, Turkish Minist Hlth, Elazig, Turkey
关键词
finite element analysis (FEA); stress distribution; zirconia framework; bone quality; vertical and oblique loading force; INLAY RESTORATIONS; COMPOSITE; DIAMETER;
D O I
10.1080/13102818.2015.1046404
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The aim of this in-silico study was to compare stress distributions in implants and zirconia frameworks of mandibular and maxillary implant-supported crowns. For comparison, vertical and oblique loading forces were used. Three-dimensional finite-element implant models of a mandibular section of bone (D2) and a maxillary section of bone (D4) with missing second molars and their zirconium-based superstructures were used. Zimmer dental implants of 13 mm in length and 4.7 mm in diameter were modelled. A load of 200 N was applied toward vertical and oblique (30 degrees to the vertical) directions. Maximum and minimum von Mises stress values of the implants and the zirconia framework were calculated. The highest stress value was concentrated in the zirconia framework of the maxillary implant-supported model with the oblique loading force (301.17 MPa). The lowest stress value was concentrated in the mandibular implant-supported model. And the stress values in the maxilla were higher than in the mandible. The maxilla (D4) showed higher stress values than in the mandible (D2), because the trabecular bone is weaker and less resistant to deformation than the cortical bone. Stress values with oblique loading forces were higher than with vertical loading forces. Because of the high Young's modulus of zirconia (low elastic properties), zirconia frameworks showed higher stress values than the implants.
引用
收藏
页码:984 / 990
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Ash M, 2002, Wheelers Dental Anatomy, Physiology, and Occlusion
[2]   Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study [J].
Ausiello, P ;
Rengo, S ;
Davidson, CL ;
Watts, DC .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2004, 20 (09) :862-872
[3]   THE INFLUENCE OF IMPLANT DIAMETER AND LENGTH ON STRESS DISTRIBUTION OF OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS RELATED TO CRESTAL BONE GEOMETRY: A THREE-DIMENSIONAL FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS [J].
Baggi, Luigi ;
Cappelloni, Ilaria ;
Di Girolamo, Michele ;
Maceri, Franco ;
Vairo, Giuseppe .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2008, 100 (06) :422-431
[4]  
Beer F.P., 1981, MECH MATER
[5]   Effect of different luting materials on the marginal adaptation of Class I ceramic inlay restorations in vitro [J].
Bott, B ;
Hannig, M .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2003, 19 (04) :264-269
[6]   MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES AND SHORT-TERM INVIVO EVALUATION OF YTTRIUM-OXIDE-PARTIALLY-STABILIZED ZIRCONIA [J].
CHRISTEL, P ;
MEUNIER, A ;
HELLER, M ;
TORRE, JP ;
PEILLE, CN .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1989, 23 (01) :45-61
[7]  
Çiftçi Y, 2001, INT J PROSTHODONT, V14, P406
[8]   STRESS-ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES IN COMPLETE DENTURES [J].
DARBAR, UR ;
HUGGETT, R ;
HARRISON, A .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1994, 22 (05) :259-264
[9]  
Desai SR., 2012, J Dent Implant, V2, P2, DOI [10.4103/0974-6781.96556, DOI 10.4103/0974-6781.96556]
[10]  
Dietschi D, 1999, J Adhes Dent, V1, P41