Management of an ACCase-inhibitor-resistant Lolium rigidum population based on the use of ALS inhibitors: weed population evolution observed over a 7 year field-scale investigation

被引:40
作者
Collavo, Alberto [1 ]
Strek, Harry [2 ]
Beffa, Roland [2 ]
Sattin, Maurizio [1 ]
机构
[1] Ist Biol Agroambientale & Forestale IBAF CNR, I-35020 Legnaro, PD, Italy
[2] Bayer CropSci AG, Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
ryegrass; resistance evolution; herbicide resistance management; multiple resistance; long-term trial; resistance mechanisms; HERBICIDE RESISTANCE; ALOPECURUS-MYOSUROIDES; ACETYL-COENZYME; CARBOXYLASE INHIBITORS; AUSTRALIA; GROWTH; SPP;
D O I
10.1002/ps.3449
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND A 7?year experiment was set up in 2002 to evaluate the long-term effects of weed management strategies based on graminicidal sulfonylureas (SUs) on the evolution of a Lolium rigidum population resistant to ACCase inhibitors in a continuous wheat cropping system. The strategies included the continued use of ALS inhibitors, the continued application of ACCase inhibitors and a simple resistance management strategy based on a biennial rotation of herbicide mode of action (MoA). RESULTS The efficacy of the tested SUs in the field decreased significantly, starting from the fourth treatment in all control strategies. Regardless of control strategy, the few survivors of the ALS treatment in the third season produced a significant number of ACCase- and ALS-resistant (multiple-resistant) progeny. Continuous ALS and biennial rotation of herbicides reduced weed densities, but L. rigidum conserved its ACCase resistance trait. Enhanced metabolism was detected in ALS-resistant plants, whereas target site was primarily involved in the ACCase-resistant individuals. CONCLUSION At the end of the experiment, multiple-resistant individuals were found in all samples coming from the control strategies investigated. The biennial rotation between ALS and other MoA appeared to delay the development of resistance to SUs over continuous treatments, but additional measures will likely need to be taken in order to make this sustainable in the long term, whereas the field efficacy of SUs remained relatively high until the end of the experiment. Integrated weed management with more diversity should be introduced in oversimplified cropping systems in order to sustainably manage resistant L. rigidum populations. Copyright (C) 2012 Society of Chemical Industry
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 208
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Fitness costs and benefits of novel herbicide tolerance in a noxious weed
    Baucom, RS
    Mauricio, R
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2004, 101 (36) : 13386 - 13390
  • [2] Beckie HJ, 2000, WEED TECHNOL, V14, P428, DOI 10.1614/0890-037X(2000)014[0428:SFHRIW]2.0.CO
  • [3] 2
  • [4] Selecting for Weed Resistance: Herbicide Rotation and Mixture
    Beckie, Hugh J.
    Reboud, Xavier
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 23 (03) : 363 - 370
  • [5] Incidence of Herbicide Resistance in Rigid Ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) across Southeastern Australia
    Boutsalis, Peter
    Gill, Gurjeet S.
    Preston, Christopher
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 26 (03) : 391 - 398
  • [6] Resistance to diclofop-methyl in two Lolium spp. populations from Italy:: studies on the mechanism of resistance
    Bravin, F
    Zanin, G
    Preston, C
    [J]. WEED RESEARCH, 2001, 41 (05) : 461 - 473
  • [7] Evolution of glyphosate resistance in a Lolium rigidum population by glyphosate selection at sublethal doses
    Busi, R.
    Powles, S. B.
    [J]. HEREDITY, 2009, 103 (04) : 318 - 325
  • [8] Long distance pollen-mediated flow of herbicide resistance genes in Lolium rigidum
    Busi, Roberto
    Yu, Qin
    Barrett-Lennard, Robert
    Powles, Stephen
    [J]. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2008, 117 (08) : 1281 - 1290
  • [9] Campagna C, 2006, ATTI GIORNATE FITOPA, V1, P329
  • [10] Modelling different cultivation and herbicide strategies for their effect on herbicide resistance in Alopecurus myosuroides
    Cavan, G
    Cussans, J
    Moss, SR
    [J]. WEED RESEARCH, 2000, 40 (06) : 561 - 568