How does environmental regulation affect environmental performance? A case study of China's regional energy efficiency

被引:22
作者
Wu, Jie [1 ]
Yang, Jiangjiang [1 ]
Zhou, Zhixiang [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Econ, Hefei 230026, Anhui, Peoples R China
关键词
data envelopment analysis; energy efficiency; environmental productivity; environmental regulation; MULTILATERAL PRODUCTIVITY COMPARISONS; UNDESIRABLE OUTPUTS; GREEN PRODUCTIVITY; CO2; EMISSIONS; INNOVATION; DEA; GROWTH; ALLOCATION; INTENSITY; SECTORS;
D O I
10.1111/exsy.12326
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Environmental regulation has been recognized as an important way to directly improve environmental performance or indirectly impact environmental performance through increasing environmental innovation. The present paper constructs an energy and carbon emission total factor productivity index using the Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index and data envelopment analysis. The proposed technique is used to measure the environmental performance of 30 Chinese provinces during the period 2010-2015. The energy and carbon emission total factor productivity measure is divided into a pure technical efficiency index and a technical progress index to provide detailed environmental performance information. Then an ordinary least squares model is adopted to analyse the impact of environmental regulation on environmental innovation operation and environmental performance by hypothesis testing. The empirical results show that environmental regulation and environmental innovation have positive direct effects on environmental performance and that market-based environmental regulation has a positive indirect effect on environmental performance by increasing environmental innovation.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 52 条
[21]   How do different innovation forms mediate the relationship between environmental regulation and performance? [J].
Hu, Die ;
Wang, Yuandi ;
Huang, Jiashun ;
Huang, Haiyan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 161 :466-476
[22]  
IPCC, 2006, IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
[23]   Environmental regulation and innovation: A panel data study [J].
Jaffe, AB ;
Palmer, K .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1997, 79 (04) :610-619
[24]   Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts [J].
Johnstone, Nick ;
Hascic, Ivan ;
Popp, David .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2010, 45 (01) :133-155
[25]  
Juan D., 2017, EUR J OPER RES, V19, P15
[26]   Regulation and efficiency: an empirical analysis of the United Kingdom continental shelf petroleum industry [J].
Kashani, HA .
ENERGY POLICY, 2005, 33 (07) :915-925
[27]   Pollution abatement costs and foreign direct investment inflows to US states [J].
Keller, W ;
Levinson, A .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2002, 84 (04) :691-703
[28]   Environmental regulations and innovation activity in UK manufacturing industries [J].
Kneller, Richard ;
Manderson, Edward .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 (02) :211-235
[29]   Impact of energy conservation policies on the green productivity in China's manufacturing sector: Evidence from a three-stage DEA model [J].
Li, Ke ;
Lin, Boqiang .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 168 :351-363
[30]   A global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index [J].
Oh, Dong-hyun .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2010, 34 (03) :183-197