Check-if-apply approach for consumers and utilities to communicate about drinking water aesthetics quality

被引:9
作者
Carneiro, Renata C., V [1 ]
Wang, Chunmiao [2 ]
Yu, Jiawei [2 ]
O'Keefe, Sean F. [1 ]
Duncan, Susan E. [1 ]
Gallagher, Conor D. [3 ]
Burlingame, Gary A. [4 ]
Dietrich, Andrea M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Food Sci & Technol, 1230 Washington St SW,402 HABB1, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, Key Lab Drinking Water Sci & Technol, 18 Shuangqing Rd, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China
[3] Virginia Tech, Comp Sci, 220 Hancock Hall,490 Old Turner St, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[4] Bur Lab Serv, Philadelphia Water Dept, 1500 E Hunting Pk Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19124 USA
[5] Virginia Tech, Civil & Environm Engn, 418 Durham Hall,1145 Perry St,MC 0246, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
关键词
Consumers; Drinking water; Taste; Odor; Aesthetics; Communication; TASTE; FLAVOR; ODOR; PERCEPTION; PREFERENCES; THRESHOLDS; GEOSMIN; COPPER;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141776
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Globally, consumers judge their drinking water through its aesthetic qualities because tastes, odors, and appearances are readily detectable by untrained consumers. Consumer feedback is critical to the water industry for efficient resolution of aesthetic water quality issues, although consumer descriptions of taste and odor issues can sometimes be unfocused or confusing. A user-friendly approach can facilitate consumer communications to utilities in the challenging task of describing drinking water taste and odor issues. The purpose of this study was to develop a list of taste and odor descriptors and test a novel "check-if-apply" approach to describe drinking water quality. The final list contained 28 individual and/or groups of descriptors. 75 participants tested water samples impacted by various tastants or odorants: duplicate samples of chloraminated tap water, tap water with heptanal, tapwater with 2-methylisoborneol (MIB), tapwaterwith NaCl, bottledwater, and bottledwaterwith CuSO4. Participants used a 9-point hedonic scale (1 = 'dislike extremely'; 9 = 'like extremely') to rate overall liking of each sample, and they used the check-if-apply list to describe the taste or odor. Participants also answered a brief questionnaire and used a 5-point scale (1 = 'very difficult'; 5='very easy') to evaluate their experience using the check-if-apply list. Significant differenceswere observed in acceptability and sensory profile of samples (p-value <0.05). Tap water with MIB had the lowest acceptability mean score (3.43 +/- 1.74), while flavorless bottled water had the highest acceptability mean score (6.23 +/- 1.47). 'Salty', 'metallic', 'chemical' and 'musty/earthy' were the dominant descriptors for NaCl, CuSO4, heptanal, and MIB, respectively. Most participants (81%) found the check-if-apply list as 'somewhat easy' to 'very easy' to use (mean= 3.44 +/- 1.07) and suggested it as a user-friendly lexicon for consumers and utilities to communicate about water quality. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2017, WHOFWCWSH1703
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2019, TASTE ODOUR SOURCE D
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, J AM CHEM SOC
  • [4] Ares G., 2014, RAPID SENSORY PROFIL, P584
  • [5] BARTELS JHM, 1986, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, V78, P50
  • [6] Bruchet A, 2019, TASTE AND ODOUR IN SOURCE AND DRINKING WATER, P113, DOI 10.2166/9781780406664_0113
  • [7] BRUVOLD WH, 1990, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, V82, P59
  • [8] Burlingame G.A., 2015, CREAT INDEP PUBL PLA, V130
  • [9] Burlingame G.A., 1991, Sunday Seminar: Case Studies on Taste and Odor: Evaluation and Treatment. Proc. AWWA Water Quality Technology Conference. Orlando, FL, P7
  • [10] BURLINGAME GA, 1992, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, V84, P92