Object-based attention: Sensory modulation or priority setting?

被引:143
作者
Shomstein, S [1 ]
Yantis, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Psychol, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
来源
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS | 2002年 / 64卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03194556
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The detection of an invalidly cued target is faster when it appears within a cued object than when it appears in an uncued object equally distant from the cued location; this is a manifestation of object-based attention. Five experiments are reported in which it was investigated whether early sensory: enhancement (in which attention "spreads" within an attended object but stops at its borders) or a later attentional prioritization mechanism best accounts for these effects. In Experiments 1-4, subjects identified a centrally located target with a buttonpress while attempting to ignore flanking distractors that were mapped to either a compatible or an incompatible response. The flankers appeared either within the object occupied by the target or in a different object but at the same distance from the target. The well-known effect of distance between the target and the flankers on the magnitude of the compatibility effect was replicated. However, whether the target and the flankers were in the same or different objects had no effect on the magnitude of the compatibility effect. In Experiment 5, when attention could not be narrowly focused in advance, object-based modulation of the flanker effect was observed. These results suggest that object-based selection may reflect an object-specific attentional prioritization strategy, rather than object-based attentional modulation of an early sensory representation.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 51
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Objects of attention, objects of perception [J].
Avrahami, J .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1999, 61 (08) :1604-1612
[2]   VISUAL PARSING AND RESPONSE COMPETITION - THE EFFECT OF GROUPING FACTORS [J].
BAYLIS, GC ;
DRIVER, J .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1992, 51 (02) :145-162
[3]   Object-based attention and occlusion: Evidence from normal participants and a computational model [J].
Behrmann, M ;
Zemel, RS ;
Mozer, MC .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1998, 24 (04) :1011-1036
[4]   DOES MOTION-INDUCED GROUPING MODULATE THE FLANKER COMPATIBILITY EFFECT - A FAILURE TO REPLICATE DRIVER AND BAYLIS [J].
BERRY, G ;
KLEIN, R .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 1993, 47 (04) :714-729
[5]   MODELING THE ROLE OF PARALLEL PROCESSING IN VISUAL-SEARCH [J].
CAVE, KR ;
WOLFE, JM .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 22 (02) :225-271
[6]   Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention [J].
Moore, Tirin ;
Zirnsak, Marc .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 68, 2017, 68 :47-72
[7]  
Downing C.J., 1985, ATTENTION PERFORM, P171
[8]   MOVEMENT AND VISUAL-ATTENTION - THE SPOTLIGHT METAPHOR BREAKS DOWN [J].
DRIVER, J ;
BAYLIS, GC .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1989, 15 (03) :448-456
[10]   Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course [J].
Egeth, HE ;
Yantis, S .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 48 :269-297