Efficacy and safety of uterine manipulators in laparoscopic surgery: a review

被引:69
作者
Van den Haak, L. [1 ]
Alleblas, C. [2 ]
Nieboer, T. E. [2 ]
Rhemrev, J. P. [3 ]
Jansen, F. W. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Gynecol, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Gynecol, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Bronovo Hosp, Dept Gynecol, NL-2509 JH The Hague, Netherlands
[4] Delft Univ Technol, Dept BioMech Engn, NL-2600 AA Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Hysterectomy; Laparoscopy; Review; Uterine manipulator; HYSTERECTOMY SPECIMENS; HOHL INSTRUMENT; INTRAUTERINE BALLOON; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER; RUMI MANIPULATOR; INJURIES; INVASION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-015-3727-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose This review aims to objectively assess the efficacy and safety of uterine manipulators as reported in scientific literature. Furthermore, it evaluates as to which manipulator best suits which surgical procedure. Methods PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, COCHRANE, CINAHL, Academic Search Premier, Science Direct and the MAUDE database were searched. Technical information was retrieved from the manufacturers. Results 25 articles covering 10 uterine manipulators were found. Studies regarding implementation and use of manipulators are scarce; only two surveys were found comparing different manipulators. Moreover, clinical evidence proving the efficacy of manipulators with respect to prevention of complications, inherent to laparoscopic surgery, does not exist. Conclusion The use of uterine manipulators is well established and it is clear that uterine manipulators offer the easiest way to handle the uterus during surgery. However, detailed information regarding efficacy and safety is scarce. Clinical evidence substantiating the assumed mechanism of prevention of ureter injuries was not found. Our review did not find the optimal manipulator. Some are more versatile than others and not all instruments are appropriate for all types of surgery. Therefore, gynecologists should choose the manipulator that best suits the type of surgery that is performed.
引用
收藏
页码:1003 / 1011
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [31] INSTRUMENTS AND EQUIPMENT USED IN OPERATIVE LAPAROSCOPY
    REICH, H
    MAHER, PJ
    [J]. BAILLIERES CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1994, 8 (04): : 687 - 705
  • [32] Rossetti A, 2003, INSTRUMENT TEST UTER
  • [33] COMPARISON OF THE CLEARVIEW UTERINE MANIPULATOR WITH THE COHEN CANNULA IN LAPAROSCOPY
    SHARP, HT
    WILLIAMS, P
    HATASAKA, HH
    POULSON, AM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 1995, 2 (02): : 207 - 211
  • [34] Uterine manipulation in operative laparoscopy by suction disposable uterine device
    Tamburro, S.
    Nouhz, E.
    Calonaci, F.
    Wattiez, A.
    Canis, M.
    Mage, G.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY, 2011, 8 (03) : 343 - 346
  • [35] Iatrogenic uterine rupture caused by overinflation of RUMI manipulator balloon
    Wu, HH
    Yeh, GP
    Hsieh, TC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 12 (02) : 174 - 176
  • [36] Relationship between minimally invasive hysterectomy, pelvic cytology, and lymph vascular space invasion: A single institution study of 458 patients
    Zhang, Chelsea
    Havrilesky, Laura J.
    Broadwater, Gloria
    Di Santo, Nicola
    Ehrisman, Jessie A.
    Lee, Paula S.
    Berchuck, Andrew
    Secord, Angeles Alvarez
    Bean, Sarah
    Bentley, Rex C.
    Valea, Fidel A.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 133 (02) : 211 - 215