Modelling tree size diversity from airborne laser scanning using canopy height models with image texture measures

被引:53
作者
Ozdemir, Ibrahim [1 ]
Donoghue, Daniel N. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Fac Forestry, Dept Wildlife Ecol & Management, TR-32260 Isparta, Turkey
[2] Univ Durham, Sci Labs, Dept Geog, Durham DH1 3LE, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
LiDAR; Vertical structure; Stand complexity; Airborne laser scanning; FOREST STRUCTURAL PARAMETERS; MEDITERRANEAN PINES; QUICKBIRD-2; IMAGERY; SMALL-FOOTPRINT; CENTRAL SPAIN; BASAL AREA; LIDAR DATA; DIAMETER; VALIDATION; DENSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.foreco.2012.12.044
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to investigate the relationships between the plot-level tree size diversity and variables derived from airborne laser scanning (ALS) data, which is a type of LiDAR measurement. We conducted a study using forest stands with a range of managed and near-natural stands with a broad range of species. 33 Plots that represent the forest stand variety in the study area were sampled; within each plot four biophysical variables were measured by ground-based methods, these were height (TH), diameter at breast height (DBH), crown length (CL), and crown width (CW). The resultant tree size diversity was parameterised as Lmoments (t) statistics and compared with both point-based and grid-based laser scanning diversity variables. Point-based measures included the ratios of the Percentile means (P99/P25, P99/P50, P99/75, and P99/P90), Coefficient of variation, Skewness, Kurtosis, and Lmoments (t). The grid-based texture measures derived from the ALS Canopy Height Models (CHMs) included firstorder texture, Standard Deviation of Grey Levels (SDGL), and three second-order texture measures, including Contrast, Entropy and Correlation. Furthermore, we tested the influence of scale by analysing the effect of grid cell sizes when generating CHMs from the raw point cloud ALS data. Using linear regression analysis, we show that the grid-based texture measures are superior predictors of tree height diversity than the point-based metrics. Sixty percent of the variance in the tree height diversity and 51% of the variance in the DBH Diversity were explained by the SDGL and Correlation texture measures, respectively (p < 0.01). The associations between the texture features and the CL Diversity and CW Diversity were weaker compared to the TH Diversity and DBH Diversity (The highest R2 was 0.46 and 0.45, respectively, p < 0.01). While the CHM calculated from a 3 x 3 m grid cell had the strongest correlation with TH Diversity (0.60, p < 0.01), the CHMs calculated from 1 x 1 m and 2 x 2 m cell size had the strongest association with DBH Diversity (0.51, p <0.01). Combining selected point- and grid-based variables accounted for up to 85% of the variance of tree height diversity, 68% of the variance of DBH Diversity and 52% of the variance of CL Diversity. Our study shows that the combination of laser-based height percentile ratios and texture measures derived from the ALS-CHM can be used to estimate tree size diversity across forest landscapes. @ 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 37
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   A Conventional Cruise and Felled-Tree Validation of Individual Tree Diameter, Height and Volume Derived from Airborne Laser Scanning Data of a Loblolly Pine (P. taeda) Stand in Eastern Texas [J].
Corrao, Mark, V ;
Sparks, Aaron M. ;
Smith, Alistair M. S. .
REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (11)
[42]   Modelling height growth of temperate mixedwood forests using an age-independent approach and multi-temporal airborne laser scanning data [J].
Riofrio, Jose ;
White, Joanne C. ;
Tompalski, Piotr ;
Coops, Nicholas C. ;
Wulder, Michael A. .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 543
[43]   Estimating forest attributes in airborne laser scanning based inventory using calibrated predictions from external models [J].
Garrido, Ana de Lera ;
Gobakken, Terje ;
Orka, Hans ;
Naesset, Erik ;
Bollandsas, Ole .
SILVA FENNICA, 2022, 56 (02)
[44]   Correction of phenology-induced effects in forest canopy height models based on airborne laser scanning data. Insights from the deciduous mountain forests in Picos de Europa National Park in Spain [J].
Pascual, Adrian ;
Guerra-Hernandez, Juan .
ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 75
[45]   Evaluating the impact of field-measured tree height errors correction on aboveground biomass modeling using airborne laser scanning and GEDI datasets in Brazilian Amazonia [J].
Fareed, Nadeem ;
Numata, Izaya .
TREES FORESTS AND PEOPLE, 2025, 19
[46]   Estimating individual tree mid- and understory rank-size distributions from airborne laser scanning in semi-arid forests [J].
Swetnam, Tyson L. ;
Falk, Donald A. ;
Lynch, Ann M. ;
Yool, Stephen R. .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 330 :271-282
[47]   Delineation of Tree Crowns and Tree Species Classification From Full-Waveform Airborne Laser Scanning Data Using 3-D Ellipsoidal Clustering [J].
Lindberg, Eva ;
Eysn, Lothar ;
Hollaus, Markus ;
Holmgren, Johan ;
Pfeifer, Norbert .
IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 7 (07) :3174-3181
[48]   Comparing tree attributes derived from quantitative structure models based on drone and mobile laser scanning point clouds across varying canopy cover conditions [J].
Qi, Yangqian ;
Coops, Nicholas C. ;
Daniels, Lori D. ;
Butson, Christopher R. .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 192 :49-65
[49]   Assessing the sensitivity of site index models developed using bi-temporal airborne laser scanning data to different top height estimates and grid cell sizes [J].
Socha, Jaroslaw ;
Hawrylo, Pawel ;
Sterenczak, Krzysztof ;
Miscicki, Stanislaw ;
Tyminska-Czabanska, Luiza ;
Mlocek, Wojciech ;
Gruba, Piotr .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2020, 91
[50]   A Model-Dependent Method for Monitoring Subtle Changes in Vegetation Height in the Boreal-Alpine Ecotone Using Bi-Temporal, Three Dimensional Point Data from Airborne Laser Scanning [J].
Naesset, Erik ;
Gobakken, Terje ;
McRoberts, Ronald E. .
REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (15)