Modelling tree size diversity from airborne laser scanning using canopy height models with image texture measures

被引:53
作者
Ozdemir, Ibrahim [1 ]
Donoghue, Daniel N. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Fac Forestry, Dept Wildlife Ecol & Management, TR-32260 Isparta, Turkey
[2] Univ Durham, Sci Labs, Dept Geog, Durham DH1 3LE, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
LiDAR; Vertical structure; Stand complexity; Airborne laser scanning; FOREST STRUCTURAL PARAMETERS; MEDITERRANEAN PINES; QUICKBIRD-2; IMAGERY; SMALL-FOOTPRINT; CENTRAL SPAIN; BASAL AREA; LIDAR DATA; DIAMETER; VALIDATION; DENSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.foreco.2012.12.044
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to investigate the relationships between the plot-level tree size diversity and variables derived from airborne laser scanning (ALS) data, which is a type of LiDAR measurement. We conducted a study using forest stands with a range of managed and near-natural stands with a broad range of species. 33 Plots that represent the forest stand variety in the study area were sampled; within each plot four biophysical variables were measured by ground-based methods, these were height (TH), diameter at breast height (DBH), crown length (CL), and crown width (CW). The resultant tree size diversity was parameterised as Lmoments (t) statistics and compared with both point-based and grid-based laser scanning diversity variables. Point-based measures included the ratios of the Percentile means (P99/P25, P99/P50, P99/75, and P99/P90), Coefficient of variation, Skewness, Kurtosis, and Lmoments (t). The grid-based texture measures derived from the ALS Canopy Height Models (CHMs) included firstorder texture, Standard Deviation of Grey Levels (SDGL), and three second-order texture measures, including Contrast, Entropy and Correlation. Furthermore, we tested the influence of scale by analysing the effect of grid cell sizes when generating CHMs from the raw point cloud ALS data. Using linear regression analysis, we show that the grid-based texture measures are superior predictors of tree height diversity than the point-based metrics. Sixty percent of the variance in the tree height diversity and 51% of the variance in the DBH Diversity were explained by the SDGL and Correlation texture measures, respectively (p < 0.01). The associations between the texture features and the CL Diversity and CW Diversity were weaker compared to the TH Diversity and DBH Diversity (The highest R2 was 0.46 and 0.45, respectively, p < 0.01). While the CHM calculated from a 3 x 3 m grid cell had the strongest correlation with TH Diversity (0.60, p < 0.01), the CHMs calculated from 1 x 1 m and 2 x 2 m cell size had the strongest association with DBH Diversity (0.51, p <0.01). Combining selected point- and grid-based variables accounted for up to 85% of the variance of tree height diversity, 68% of the variance of DBH Diversity and 52% of the variance of CL Diversity. Our study shows that the combination of laser-based height percentile ratios and texture measures derived from the ALS-CHM can be used to estimate tree size diversity across forest landscapes. @ 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 37
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Classification of tree species classes in a hemi-boreal forest from multispectral airborne laser scanning data using a mini raster cell method
    Lindberg, Eva
    Holmgren, Johan
    Olsson, Hakan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2021, 100
  • [22] Spatially Explicit Individual Tree Height Growth Models from Bi-Temporal Aerial Laser Scanning
    Salekin, Serajis
    Pont, David
    Dickinson, Yvette
    Amarasena, Sumedha
    REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (13)
  • [23] Spatial Models With Inter-Tree Competition From Airborne Laser Scanning Improve Estimates of Genetic Variance
    Pont, David
    Dungey, Heidi S.
    Suontama, Mari
    Stovold, Grahame T.
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2021, 11
  • [24] Confirmation of post-harvest spectral recovery from Landsat time series using measures of forest cover and height derived from airborne laser scanning data
    White, Joanne C.
    Saarinen, Ninni
    Kankare, Ville
    Wulder, Michael A.
    Hermosilla, Txomin
    Coops, Nicholas C.
    Pickell, Paul D.
    Holopainen, Markus
    Hyyppa, Juha
    Vastaranta, Mikko
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 216 : 262 - 275
  • [25] Effects of Pulse Density on Digital Terrain Models and Canopy Metrics Using Airborne Laser Scanning in a Tropical Rainforest
    Hansen, Endre Hofstad
    Gobakken, Terje
    Naesset, Erik
    REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 7 (07) : 8453 - 8468
  • [26] SINGLE TREE DETECTION FROM AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING DATA USING A MARKED POINT PROCESS BASED METHOD
    Zhang, Junjie
    Sohn, Gunho
    Bredif, Mathieu
    VCM 2013 - THE ISPRS WORKSHOP ON 3D VIRTUAL CITY MODELING, 2013, II-3/W1 : 41 - 46
  • [27] Classifying individual tree genera using stepwise cluster analysis based on height and intensity metrics derived from airborne laser scanner data
    Kim, Sooyoung
    Hinckley, Thomas
    Briggs, David
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 115 (12) : 3329 - 3342
  • [28] Estimating tree species composition from airborne laser scanning data using point-based deep learning models
    Murray, Brent A.
    Coops, Nicholas C.
    Winiwarter, Lukas
    White, Joanne C.
    Dick, Adam
    Barbeito, Ignacio
    Ragab, Ahmed
    ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 207 : 282 - 297
  • [29] Comparing canopy height estimates from satellite-based photogrammetry, airborne laser scanning and field measurements across Australian production and conservation eucalypt forests
    Olive, Kent
    Lewis, Tom
    Ghaffariyan, Mohammad Reza
    Srivastava, Sanjeev Kumar
    JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2020, 25 (02) : 108 - 112
  • [30] Integrating area-based and individual tree detection approaches for estimating tree volume in plantation inventory using aerial image and airborne laser scanning data
    Shinzato, Emily T.
    Shimabukuro, Yosio E.
    Coops, Nicholas C.
    Tompalski, Piotr
    Gasparoto, Esthevan A. G.
    IFOREST-BIOGEOSCIENCES AND FORESTRY, 2017, 10 : 296 - 302