The clinical and radiological outcomes of multilevel minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

被引:33
|
作者
Min, Sang-Hyuk [1 ,2 ]
Yoo, Jae-Sung [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Dankook Univ, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Cheonan 330715, South Korea
[2] Dankook Univ, Coll Med, Dept Prevent Med, Cheonan 330715, South Korea
关键词
Multilevel interbody fusion; Minimally invasive surgery; Transforaminal; Lumbar interbody fusion;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-012-2619-y
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose To investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of multilevel minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF) in multilevel degenerative lumbar diseases. Methods Of 172 patients who could be followed-up for at least 1 year after undergoing a MITLIF, a total of 127 patients in whom unilateral cages were used through a unilateral approach (consisting of 69 patients for single-level, 40 for two-level, and 18 for three-or higher-level) were retrospectively studied as subjects. In this study, clinical assessment parameters included Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), while radiologic assessment parameters included disc height, segmental lordotic angle, and lumbar lordotic angle. At the last follow-up, the level of bone fusion was determined in accordance with the Brantigan and Steffee criteria for classification of fusion results. Results The VAS scores of back pain and radiating leg pain tended to improve postoperatively, and showed no significant difference among groups (p > 0.05). In terms of ODI, the results of functional assessments also indicated no significant difference among groups (p > 0.05). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in disc height, segmental lordotic angle, lumbar lordotic angle, and bone fusion depending on the number of fusion levels (p > 0.05). Conclusions Regardless of the number of fused levels, satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes of MITLIF were seen in patients with spinal stenosis, which suggests that the said surgical procedure may be useful even for patients with multilevel spinal stenosis.
引用
收藏
页码:1164 / 1172
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of peri-operative and 12-month lifestyle outcomes in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus conventional lumbar fusion
    Virdee, Jagdeep Singh
    Nadig, Adarsh
    Anagnostopoulos, George
    George, Kuriakose Joshi
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 31 (02) : 167 - 171
  • [42] Comparison of clinical outcomes and complications between endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Haibier, Abuduwupuer
    Yusufu, Alimujiang
    Hang, Lin
    Abudurexiti, Tuerhongjiang
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [43] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis: Comparison Between Isthmic and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Kim, Jong Yeol
    Park, Jeong Yoon
    Kim, Kyung Hyun
    Kuh, Sung Uk
    Chin, Dong Kyu
    Kim, Keun Su
    Cho, Yong Eun
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 84 (05) : 1284 - 1293
  • [44] Risk Factors of Cage Subsidence in Patients Received Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Yao, Yu-Cheng
    Chou, Po-Hsin
    Lin, Hsi-Hsien
    Wang, Shih-Tien
    Liu, Chien-Lin
    Chang, Ming-Chau
    SPINE, 2020, 45 (19) : E1279 - E1285
  • [45] Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Complications Between Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Guo, Haiwei
    Song, Yuke
    Weng, Rui
    Tian, Han
    Yuan, Jiayao
    Li, Ying
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 13 (05) : 1394 - 1404
  • [46] Comparison of clinical outcomes and complications between endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Abuduwupuer Haibier
    Alimujiang Yusufu
    Lin Hang
    Tuerhongjiang Abudurexiti
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 19
  • [47] A Comparison of Polyetheretherketone and Titanium-Coated Polyetheretherketone in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Singhatanadgige, Weerasak
    Tangchitcharoen, Nattapat
    Kerr, Stephen J.
    Tanasansomboon, Teerachat
    Yingsakmongkol, Wicharn
    Kotheeranurak, Vit
    Limthongkul, Worawat
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 168 : E471 - E479
  • [48] Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with a Tubular Retractor System: A Retrospective Controlled Study
    Wang, Jin-Chang
    Cao, Zheng
    Li, Zhen-Zhou
    Zhao, Hong-Liang
    Hou, Shu-Xun
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 165 : E457 - E468
  • [49] A Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Prospective Quality Outcomes Database
    Chan, Andrew K.
    Bisson, Erica F.
    Bydon, Mohamad
    Foley, Kevin T.
    Glassman, Steven D.
    Shaffrey, Christopher, I
    Wang, Michael Y.
    Park, Paul
    Potts, Eric A.
    Shaffrey, Mark E.
    Coric, Domagoj
    Knightly, John J.
    Fu, Kai-Ming
    Slotkin, Jonathan R.
    Asher, Anthony L.
    Virk, Michael S.
    Kerezoudis, Panagiotis
    Alvi, Mohammed A.
    Guan, Jian
    Haid, Regis W.
    Mummaneni, Praveen, V
    NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 87 (03) : 555 - 562
  • [50] Minimally invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: One-year postoperative morbidity, clinical and radiological results of a prospective multicenter study of 182 cases
    Giorgi, H.
    Prebet, R.
    Delhaye, M.
    Aurouer, N.
    Mangione, P.
    Blondel, B.
    Tropiano, P.
    Fuentes, S.
    Parent, H. -F.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2015, 101 (06) : S241 - S245