The clinical and radiological outcomes of multilevel minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

被引:33
|
作者
Min, Sang-Hyuk [1 ,2 ]
Yoo, Jae-Sung [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Dankook Univ, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Cheonan 330715, South Korea
[2] Dankook Univ, Coll Med, Dept Prevent Med, Cheonan 330715, South Korea
关键词
Multilevel interbody fusion; Minimally invasive surgery; Transforaminal; Lumbar interbody fusion;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-012-2619-y
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose To investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of multilevel minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF) in multilevel degenerative lumbar diseases. Methods Of 172 patients who could be followed-up for at least 1 year after undergoing a MITLIF, a total of 127 patients in whom unilateral cages were used through a unilateral approach (consisting of 69 patients for single-level, 40 for two-level, and 18 for three-or higher-level) were retrospectively studied as subjects. In this study, clinical assessment parameters included Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), while radiologic assessment parameters included disc height, segmental lordotic angle, and lumbar lordotic angle. At the last follow-up, the level of bone fusion was determined in accordance with the Brantigan and Steffee criteria for classification of fusion results. Results The VAS scores of back pain and radiating leg pain tended to improve postoperatively, and showed no significant difference among groups (p > 0.05). In terms of ODI, the results of functional assessments also indicated no significant difference among groups (p > 0.05). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in disc height, segmental lordotic angle, lumbar lordotic angle, and bone fusion depending on the number of fusion levels (p > 0.05). Conclusions Regardless of the number of fused levels, satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes of MITLIF were seen in patients with spinal stenosis, which suggests that the said surgical procedure may be useful even for patients with multilevel spinal stenosis.
引用
收藏
页码:1164 / 1172
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reduced Acute Care Costs With the ERAS® Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared With Conventional Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Wang, Michael Y.
    Chang, Hsuan Kan
    Grossman, Jay
    NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 83 (04) : 827 - 834
  • [22] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion-indications and clinical experience
    Hari, Akshay
    Krishna, Murali
    Rajagandhi, Santhosh
    Rajakumar, Deshpande V.
    NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2016, 64 (03) : 444 - 454
  • [23] Comparison of hidden blood loss and clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Meng Ge
    Yuan Zhang
    Hang Ying
    Chenchen Feng
    Yanlei Li
    Jinlong Tian
    Tingxiao Zhao
    Haiyu Shao
    Yazeng Huang
    International Orthopaedics, 2022, 46 : 2063 - 2070
  • [24] Comparison of hidden blood loss and clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Ge, Meng
    Zhang, Yuan
    Ying, Hang
    Feng, Chenchen
    Li, Yanlei
    Tian, Jinlong
    Zhao, Tingxiao
    Shao, Haiyu
    Huang, Yazeng
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2022, 46 (09) : 2063 - 2070
  • [25] Diminishing Clinical Returns of Multilevel Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Passias, Peter G.
    Bortz, Cole
    Horn, Samantha R.
    Segreto, Frank A.
    Stekas, Nicholas
    Ge, David H.
    Alas, Haddy
    Varlotta, Christopher G.
    Frangella, Nicholas J.
    Lafage, Renaud
    Lafage, Virginie
    Steinmetz, Leah
    Vasquez-Montes, Dennis
    Diebo, Bassel
    Janjua, Muhammad B.
    Moawad, Mohamed A.
    Deflorimonte, Chloe
    Protopsaltis, Themistocles S.
    Buckland, Aaron J.
    Gerling, Michael C.
    SPINE, 2019, 44 (20) : E1181 - E1187
  • [26] MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION WITH EXPANDABLE CAGES
    Buckland, Aaron J.
    Proctor, Dylan J.
    JBJS ESSENTIAL SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 13 (02):
  • [27] History and Evolution of the Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Prabhu, Michael C.
    Jacob, Kevin C.
    Patel, Madhav R.
    Pawlowski, Hanna
    Vanjani, Nisheka N.
    Singh, Kern
    NEUROSPINE, 2022, 19 (03) : 479 - 491
  • [28] Minimally invasive tubular surgery for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Kimball, Jon
    Yew, Andrew
    Getachew, Ruth
    Lu, Daniel C.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2013, 35
  • [29] Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis
    Massie, Lara W.
    Zakaria, Hesham Mostafa
    Schultz, Lonni R.
    Basheer, Azam
    Buraimoh, Morenikeji Ayodele
    Chang, Victor
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2018, 44 (01)
  • [30] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spine
    Chaudhary, Kshitij S.
    Groff, Michael W.
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2011, 26 (03) : 146 - 155