The clinical and radiological outcomes of multilevel minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

被引:33
|
作者
Min, Sang-Hyuk [1 ,2 ]
Yoo, Jae-Sung [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Dankook Univ, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Cheonan 330715, South Korea
[2] Dankook Univ, Coll Med, Dept Prevent Med, Cheonan 330715, South Korea
关键词
Multilevel interbody fusion; Minimally invasive surgery; Transforaminal; Lumbar interbody fusion;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-012-2619-y
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose To investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of multilevel minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF) in multilevel degenerative lumbar diseases. Methods Of 172 patients who could be followed-up for at least 1 year after undergoing a MITLIF, a total of 127 patients in whom unilateral cages were used through a unilateral approach (consisting of 69 patients for single-level, 40 for two-level, and 18 for three-or higher-level) were retrospectively studied as subjects. In this study, clinical assessment parameters included Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), while radiologic assessment parameters included disc height, segmental lordotic angle, and lumbar lordotic angle. At the last follow-up, the level of bone fusion was determined in accordance with the Brantigan and Steffee criteria for classification of fusion results. Results The VAS scores of back pain and radiating leg pain tended to improve postoperatively, and showed no significant difference among groups (p > 0.05). In terms of ODI, the results of functional assessments also indicated no significant difference among groups (p > 0.05). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in disc height, segmental lordotic angle, lumbar lordotic angle, and bone fusion depending on the number of fusion levels (p > 0.05). Conclusions Regardless of the number of fused levels, satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes of MITLIF were seen in patients with spinal stenosis, which suggests that the said surgical procedure may be useful even for patients with multilevel spinal stenosis.
引用
收藏
页码:1164 / 1172
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative Effectiveness of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Jagtiani, Pemla
    Karabacak, Mert
    Margetis, Konstantinos
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2024, 37 (06): : E225 - E238
  • [22] Clinical and Radiographic Comparison Between Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Bilateral Facetectomies
    Le, Hai
    Anderson, Ryan
    Phan, Eileen
    Wick, Joseph
    Barber, Joshua
    Roberto, Rolando
    Klineberg, Eric
    Javidan, Yashar
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 11 (06) : 903 - 910
  • [23] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbosacral interbody fusion
    Chang, Peng-Yuan
    Wang, Michael Y.
    Neurosurgical Focus, 2016, 41
  • [24] Surgeon and patient radiation exposure in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Bindal, Rajesh K.
    Glaze, Sharon
    Ognoskie, Meghann
    Tunner, Van
    Malone, Robert
    Ghosh, Subrata
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2008, 9 (06) : 570 - 573
  • [25] Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Cui, Guan-yu
    Han, Xiao-guang
    Wei, Yi
    Liu, Ya-jun
    He, Da
    Sun, Yu-qing
    Liu, Bo
    Tian, Wei
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2021, 13 (07) : 1960 - 1968
  • [26] How Does Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Influence Lumbar Radiologic Parameters?
    Pereira, Claudia
    Silva, Pedro Santos
    Cunha, Marisa
    Vaz, Rui
    Pereira, Paulo
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 116 : E895 - E902
  • [27] Comparison of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal and Anterolateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Low-grade Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Zhu, Lei
    Wang, Pingchuan
    Zhang, Liang
    Feng, Xinmin
    Zhang, Wenjie
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2022, 35 (02): : E285 - E291
  • [28] Evolution of the Minimally Invasive Surgery Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Where Are We Now?
    Dada, Abraham
    Saggi, Satvir
    Ambati, Vardhaan S.
    Patel, Arati
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2025, 96 (3S) : S33 - S41
  • [29] Considerations When Contemplating Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Chou, Dean
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 84 (05) : 1205 - 1206
  • [30] Predictors of Poor Outcome in Patients Submitted to Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Costa, Jose
    Silva, Pedro Santos
    Cunha, Marisa
    Almeida, Mariana
    Vaz, Rui
    Pereira, Paulo
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 119 : 488 - 493