Policy Process Theory for Rural Studies: Navigating Context and Generalization in Rural Policy

被引:4
作者
Peterson, Holly L. [1 ]
Mcbeth, Mark K. [2 ]
Jones, Michael D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Alabama, Dept Polit Sci & Criminal Justice, Mobile, AL 36688 USA
[2] Idaho State Univ, Polit Sci, Pocatello, ID 83209 USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Dept Polit Sci, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
关键词
Public Policy; Policy Process; Rural Policy; Rural Studies; Public Policy Theory; Institutional Development and Analysis Framework; Advocacy Coalition Framework; ACF; Social Construction Framework; Narrative Policy Framework; NPF; Multiple Streams Approach; ENVIRONMENTAL-POLICY; SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION; ELECTED OFFICIALS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; FRAMEWORK; NARRATIVES; ATTITUDES; COMMUNITIES; INFORMATION; OPPOSITION;
D O I
10.1111/polp.12366
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Rural studies and policy process literature are ripe for integration due to their interdisciplinary approaches, empirical-foci, and importance of values, norms, and heuristics. Policy process theory often ignores the important context-rich variation within the rural and urban distinction, yet offers qualities rural scholars may find useful, like generalizability. This integration would improve both literature by facilitating empirical inquiry. Process theory "lenses" offer internal consistency, a shared research agenda, and applicability in many settings. These qualities encourage sharing and comparing of diverse research findings, thereby advancing common understanding and exploration of the policy process. In illustration of these ideas, this article reviews five policy process frameworks, the Institutional Development and Analysis framework, the Advocacy Coalition Framework, the Social Construction Framework, the Narrative Policy Framework, and the Multiple Streams Approach, extant rural policy process studies, and provides examples of how the literature may be integrated to explore specific research areas and questions.
引用
收藏
页码:576 / 617
页数:42
相关论文
共 140 条