Adapted Intervention Mapping: A Strategic Planning Process for Increasing Physical Activity and Healthy Eating Opportunities in Schools via Environment and Policy Change

被引:44
作者
Belansky, Elaine S. [1 ,2 ]
Cutforth, Nick [2 ,3 ]
Chavez, Robert [1 ,2 ]
Crane, Lori A. [1 ]
Waters, Emily [1 ,2 ]
Marshall, Julie A. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Community & Behav Hlth, Colorado Sch Publ Hlth, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Rocky Mt Prevent Res Ctr, Colorado Sch Publ Hlth, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[3] Univ Denver, Res Methods & Stat Program, Morgridge Coll Educ, Denver, CO 80208 USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Dept Epidemiol, Colorado Sch Publ Hlth, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
关键词
nutrition and diet; physical activity; program planning; NATIONALLY REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE; RESOURCE TEACHERS; DIETARY BEHAVIORS; LOW-INCOME; EDUCATION; NUTRITION; PROGRAM; CHILDREN; INDEX; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1111/josh.12015
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND School environment and policy changes have increased healthy eating and physical activity; however, there has been modest success in translating research findings to practice. The School Environment Project tested whether an adapted version of Intervention Mapping (AIM) resulted in school change. METHODS Using a pair randomized design, 10 rural elementary schools were assigned to AIM or the School Health Index (SHI). Baseline measures were collected fall 2005, AIM was conducted 2005-2006, and follow-up measures were collected fall 2006 and 2007. Outcome measures included number and type of effective environment and policy changes implemented; process measures included the extent to which 11 implementation steps were used. RESULTS AIM schools made an average of 4.4 effective changes per school with 90% still in place a year later. SHI schools made an average of 0.6 effective changes with 66% in place a year later. Implementation steps distinguishing AIM from SHI included use of external, trained facilitators; principal involvement; explicitly stating the student behavior goals; identifying effective environment and policy changes; prioritizing potential changes based on importance and feasibility; and developing an action plan. CONCLUSION The AIM process led to environment and policy changes known to increase healthy eating and physical activity.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 205
页数:12
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Allaway D, 1995, FOOD CHOICES SCH TAS, P55
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, SCH HLTH IND SELF AS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, CLIN GUID ID EV TREA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, PLANNING HLTH PROMOT
[5]   Outcomes from a school-based nutrition education program using resource teachers and cross-disciplinary models [J].
Auld, GW ;
Romaniello, C ;
Heimendinger, J ;
Hambidge, C ;
Hambidge, M .
JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION, 1998, 30 (05) :268-280
[6]   Outcomes from a school-based nutrition education program alternating special resource teachers and classroom teachers [J].
Auld, GW ;
Romaniello, C ;
Heimendinger, J ;
Hambidge, C ;
Hambidge, M .
JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 1999, 69 (10) :403-408
[7]  
Austin SB, 2006, PREV CHRONIC DIS
[8]   Intervention mapping: A process for developing theory- and evidence-based health education programs [J].
Bartholomew, LK ;
Parcel, GS ;
Kok, G .
HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 1998, 25 (05) :545-563
[9]  
BARTHOLOMEW LK, 2001, PLANNING HLTH PROMOT
[10]   An Adapted Version of Intervention Mapping (AIM) Is a Tool for Conducting Community-Based Participatory Research [J].
Belansky, Elaine S. ;
Cutforth, Nick ;
Chavez, Robert A. ;
Waters, Emily ;
Bartlett-Horch, Kandiss .
HEALTH PROMOTION PRACTICE, 2011, 12 (03) :440-455