A comparison of information sharing behaviours across 379 health conditions on Twitter

被引:27
作者
Zhang, Ziqi [1 ]
Ahmed, Wasim [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Northumbria Univ, Northumbria, England
关键词
Public health; Health conditions; Social media; Twitter; Network analysis; Data science; SOCIAL MEDIA; TWEET;
D O I
10.1007/s00038-018-1192-5
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo compare information sharing of over 379 health conditions on Twitter to uncover trends and patterns of online user activities. MethodsWe collected 1.5 million tweets generated by over 450,000 Twitter users for 379 health conditions, each of which was quantified using a multivariate model describing engagement, user and content aspects of the data and compared using correlation and network analysis to discover patterns of user activities in these online communities. ResultsWe found a significant imbalance in terms of the size of communities interested in different health conditions, regardless of the seriousness of these conditions. Improving the informativeness of tweets by using, for example, URLs, multimedia and mentions can be important factors in promoting health conditions on Twitter. Using hashtags on the contrary is less effective. Social network analysis revealed similar structures of the discussion found across different health conditions.ConclusionsOur study found variance in activity between different health communities on Twitter, and our results are likely to be of interest to public health authorities and officials interested in the potential of Twitter to raise awareness of public health.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 440
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Ahmed W., 2018, THESIS
[2]   Measuring the Effect of Public Health Campaigns on Twitter: The Case of World Autism Awareness Day [J].
Ahmed, Wasim ;
Bath, Peter A. ;
Sbaffi, Laura ;
Demartini, Gianluca .
TRANSFORMING DIGITAL WORLDS, ICONFERENCE 2018, 2018, 10766 :10-16
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, The Guardian
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, P 4 WORKSH BUILD EV
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, BEROERTE GT CIJFERS
[6]   Activity, content, contributors, and influencers of the twitter discussion on urologic oncology [J].
Borgmann, Hendrik ;
Loeb, Stacy ;
Salem, Johannes ;
Thomas, Christian ;
Haferkamp, Axel ;
Murphy, Declan G. ;
Tsaur, Igor .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 34 (09) :377-383
[7]   #colorectalsurgery [J].
Brady, R. R. W. ;
Chapman, S. J. ;
Atallah, S. ;
Chand, M. ;
Mayol, J. ;
Lacy, A. M. ;
Wexner, S. D. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 (11) :1470-1476
[8]   Social media for arthritis-related comparative effectiveness and safety research and the impact of direct-to-consumer advertising [J].
Curtis, Jeffrey R. ;
Chen, Lang ;
Higginbotham, Phillip ;
Nowell, W. Benjamin ;
Gal-Levy, Ronit ;
Willig, James ;
Safford, Monika ;
Coe, Joseph ;
O'Hara, Kaitlin ;
Sa'adon, Roee .
ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2017, 19
[9]   Social media: A tool to spread information: A case study analysis of Twitter conversation at the Cardiac Society of Australia a New Zealand 61st Annual Scientific Meeting 2013 [J].
Ferguson, Caleb ;
Inglis, Sally C. ;
Newton, Phillip J. ;
Cripps, Peter J. S. ;
Macdonald, Peter S. ;
Davidson, Patricia M. .
COLLEGIAN, 2014, 21 (02) :89-93
[10]   Tweet this: how advocacy for breast and prostate cancers stacks up on social media [J].
Loeb, Stacy ;
Stork, Brian ;
Gold, Heather T. ;
Stout, Natasha K. ;
Makarov, Danil V. ;
Weight, Christopher J. ;
Borgmann, Hendrik .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 120 (04) :461-463