Comparison of the Intraocular Pressure Measured Using the New Rebound Tonometer Icare ic100 and Icare TA01i or Goldmann Applanation Tonometer

被引:19
作者
Nakakura, Shunsuke [1 ]
Mori, Etsuko [1 ]
Fujio, Yuki [1 ]
Fujisawa, Yasuko [1 ]
Matsuya, Kanae [1 ]
Kobayashi, Yui [1 ]
Tabuchi, Hitoshi [1 ]
Asaoka, Ryo [2 ]
Kiuchi, Yoshiaki [3 ]
机构
[1] Saneikai Tsukazaki Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, 68-1 Aboshi Waku, Himeji, Hyogo 6711227, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo, Dept Ophthalmol, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Biomed Sci, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Hiroshima, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
intraocular pressure; Icare ic100; rebound tonometer; Goldmann applanation tonometer; PORTABLE TONOMETERS; ACCURACY; EASE;
D O I
10.1097/IJG.0000000000001138
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: We evaluated the agreement between the intraocular pressure (IOP) values of new rebound tonometer, Icare ic100, and Icare TA01i or Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT). Methods: We studied one eye each of 106 subjects (57 with primary open-angle glaucoma, 49 healthy subjects). IOP was randomly measured twice with the patient in sitting position using the Icare ic100, Icare TA01i, and GAT. Tonometer measurements were evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis. The relationship between IOP difference (Icare ic100-GAT) and age, sex, disease, axial length, central corneal thickness (CCT), and corneal curvature was investigated using multivariate regression analysis. Results: IOPs measured using Icare ic100, Icare TA0li, and GAT were 11.7 +/- 3.0 (mean +/- standard deviation), 12.2 +/- 2.9, and 16.0 +/- 3.2 mm Hg, respectively (P < 0.001, one-way analysis of variance). Icare ic100 showed significantly lower IOPs than GAT (P < 0.05), but not than Icare TA01 (P > 0.05; Tukey-Kramer test). Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the mean differences between Icare ic100 and Icare TA01i and those between Icare ic100 and GAT were -0.46 and -4.2 mm Hg, respectively (95% limits of agreement, -3.35 to 2.42 and -10.10 to 1.61 mm Hg, respectively). For IOP differences between Icare ic100 and GAT, parameters selected in the optimal model were CCT (coefficient, 20.3, P = 0.029), corneal curvature (3.0, P = 0.020), and glaucoma-normal (-1.0, P = 0.004). Conclusions: The new rebound tonometer Icare ic100 almost constantly showed IOPs lower than GAT. The difference was affected by CCT, corneal curvature, and disease.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 177
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Effect of manual eyelid manipulation on intraocular pressure measurement by rebound tonometry [J].
Baek, Sung Uk ;
Ha, Ahnul ;
Kim, Young Kook ;
Jeoung, Jin Wook ;
Park, Ki Ho .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 102 (11) :1515-1519
[2]  
Baghdasaryan E, 2018, OPHTHALMIC RES
[3]   Multimodel inference - understanding AIC and BIC in model selection [J].
Burnham, KP ;
Anderson, DR .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2004, 33 (02) :261-304
[4]   Accuracy of the new ICare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes [J].
García-Resúa, C ;
González-Meijome, JM ;
Gilino, J ;
Yebra-Pimentel, E .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2006, 83 (02) :102-107
[5]   The use of the Icare tonometer reduced the need for anesthesia to measure intraocular pressure in children [J].
Grigorian, Florin ;
Grigorian, A. Paula ;
Olitsky, Scott E. .
JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2012, 16 (06) :508-510
[6]   Clinical Use of a New Position-independent Rebound Tonometer [J].
Jablonski, Kerstin Stephanie ;
Rosentreter, Andre ;
Gaki, Stergiani ;
Lappas, Alexandra ;
Dietlein, Thomas Stefan .
JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2013, 22 (09) :763-767
[7]   Agreement among Goldmann applanation tonometer, iCare, and Icare PRO rebound tonometers; non-contact tonometer; and Tonopen XL in healthy elderly subjects [J].
Kato, Yoshitake ;
Nakakura, Shunsuke ;
Matsuo, Naoko ;
Yoshitomi, Kayo ;
Handa, Marina ;
Tabuchi, Hitoshi ;
Kiuchi, Yoshiaki .
INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 38 (02) :687-696
[8]   Comparison of the Icare Tonometer and the Hand-held Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Pediatric Aphakia [J].
Li, Yunping ;
Tang, Luosheng ;
Xiao, Manyi ;
Jia, Songbai ;
Liu, Ping ;
Zhou, Yi ;
Chen, Huihui ;
Zeng, Jiexi .
JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2013, 22 (07) :550-554
[9]   SOME COMMENTS ON CP [J].
MALLOWS, CL .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1973, 15 (04) :661-675
[10]   The usefulness of CorvisST Tonometry and the Ocular Response Analyzer to assess the progression of glaucoma [J].
Matsuura, Masato ;
Hirasawa, Kazunori ;
Murata, Hiroshi ;
Nakakura, Shunsuke ;
Kiuchi, Yoshiaki ;
Asaoka, Ryo .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7