Culling Decisions and Dairy Cattle Welfare During Transport to Slaughter in the United States

被引:32
|
作者
Edwards-Callaway, Lily N. [1 ]
Walker, Jennifer [2 ]
Tucker, Cassandra B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Qual & Food Safety Danone North Amer, White Plains, NY USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Anim Sci, Ctr Anim Welf, Davis, CA 95616 USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE | 2019年 / 5卷
关键词
slaugher; cull dairy cow; transport; animal welfare; supply chain; COWS; LIE;
D O I
10.3389/fvets.2018.00343
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Nearly a third of dairy cows are removed from herds annually in the United States. Our objective is to describe what is known about the process of sending a dairy cow to slaughter in the United States including our perspectives about her fitness for transport, her condition upon arrival at the slaughter plant and the decisions to transport her in the first place. This process begins when the decision is made by the farmer to remove a cow from the herd. Once a cow leaves the farm, she makes her way either directly to slaughter or goes through one or more livestock auctions or markets along the way. Cull cows can travel considerable distance to slaughter and may face a number of welfare challenges during this process. These stressors are exacerbated if the cows are compromised and not fit for transport. While all major industry stakeholders have recommendations or guidelines about fitness for transport, none are enforced rules or regulations. There is little financial disincentive for farmers to stop shipping compromised dairy cows, and, in some cases, slaughter plants are willing to take the risk on purchasing cows in this condition as those that survive the journey often generate a good margin of return. As a result, the decision to ship compromised cull cows is too common, as indicated by data about cow condition both at the farm and the slaughter plant. Compromised culled dairy cattle continue to arrive at slaughter plants and leadership within the industry is needed to tackle this welfare challenge.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [21] The welfare of low-volume farm animals during transport and at slaughter: a review of current knowledge and recommendations for future research
    Bornett-Gauci, H. L. I.
    Martin, J. E.
    Arney, D. R.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2006, 15 (03) : 299 - 308
  • [22] Attitudes and professional values of veterinarians and veterinary students toward positive welfare states for dairy cattle
    Brunt, M. W.
    Haley, D. B.
    Leblanc, S. J.
    Kelton, D. F.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2024, 107 (09) : 7211 - 7220
  • [23] Reproductive risk factors for culling and productive life in large dairy herds in the eastern United States between 2001 and 2006
    De Vries, A.
    Olson, J. D.
    Pinedo, P. J.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 (02) : 613 - 623
  • [24] Annual rhythms of milk and milk fat and protein production in dairy cattle in the United States
    Salfer, I. J.
    Dechow, C. D.
    Harvatine, K. J.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2019, 102 (01) : 742 - 753
  • [25] Assessment of chronically ill or injured feedlot cattle populations at eight United States and nine Canadian feedlots and implications for cattle welfare
    Sundman, Emiline R.
    Millman, Suzanne T.
    Schwartzkopf-Genswein, Karen S.
    Dewell, Renee D.
    Perrett, Tye
    Booker, Calvin W.
    Erickson, Sarah E.
    Silva, Gustavo S.
    Thomson, Daniel U.
    Johnson, Anna K.
    Dewell, Grant A.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 102 : 11 - 12
  • [26] Assessment of chronically ill or injured feedlot cattle populations at eight United States and nine Canadian feedlots and implications for cattle welfare
    Sundman, Emiline R.
    Millman, Suzanne T.
    Schwartzkopf-Genswein, Karen S.
    Dewell, Renee D.
    Perrett, Tye
    Booker, Calvin W.
    Erickson, Sarah E.
    Silva, Gustavo S.
    Thomson, Daniel U.
    Johnson, Anna K.
    Dewell, Grant A.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 102 : 11 - 11
  • [27] Determination of Dairy Cattle Euthanasia Criteria and Analysis of Barriers to Humane Euthanasia in the United States: Dairy Producer Surveys and Focus Groups
    Wagner, Brooklyn K.
    Cramer, Mary Caitlin
    Fowler, Heather N.
    Varnell, Hannah L.
    Dietsch, Alia M.
    Proudfoot, Kathryn L.
    Shearer, Jan
    Correa, Maria
    Pairis-Garcia, Monique D.
    ANIMALS, 2020, 10 (05):
  • [28] Association between thermal environment and Salmonella in fecal samples from dairy cattle in midwestern United States
    Likavec, Tasha
    Pires, Alda F. A.
    Funk, Julie A.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE VETERINAIRE, 2016, 80 (03): : 183 - 188
  • [29] Determination of Dairy Cattle Euthanasia Criteria and Analysis of Barriers to Humane Euthanasia in the United States: The Veterinarian Perspective
    Wagner, Brooklyn K.
    Cramer, Mary Caitlin
    Fowler, Heather N.
    Varnell, Hannah L.
    Dietsch, Alia M.
    Proudfoot, Kathryn L.
    Shearer, Jan
    Correa, Maria
    Pairis-Garcia, Monique D.
    ANIMALS, 2020, 10 (06): : 1 - 17
  • [30] Expert Consultation: Factors Influencing End-of-Life Decision-Making for Dairy Cattle Across the United States Supply Chain
    Edwards-Callaway, Lily
    Mcbride, Brianna
    Machuca, Erica
    Dean, Lauren
    Sayre, Kira
    Cramer, Catie
    Roman-Muniz, Noa
    Keller, Kayleigh
    Stallones, Lorann
    Manriquez, Diego
    ANIMALS, 2024, 14 (22):