Estimation of Actual Evapotranspiration and Crop Coefficient of Transplanted Puddled Rice Using a Modified Non-Weighing Paddy Lysimeter

被引:14
作者
Kumari, Arti [1 ]
Upadhyaya, Ashutosh [1 ]
Jeet, Pawan [1 ]
Al-Ansari, Nadhir [2 ]
Rajput, Jitendra [3 ]
Sundaram, Prem K. [1 ]
Saurabh, Kirti [1 ]
Prakash, Ved [1 ]
Singh, Anil K. [1 ]
Raman, Rohan K. [1 ]
Gaddikeri, Venkatesh [3 ]
Kuriqi, Alban [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Parisar, ICAR Res Complex Eastern Reg, Patna 800014, India
[2] Lulea Univ Technol, Civil Environm & Nat Resources Engn, S-97187 Lulea, Sweden
[3] ICAR IARI, Div Agr Engn, New Delhi 110012, India
[4] Univ Lisbon, CERIS, Inst Super Tecn, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
[5] Univ Business & Technol, Civil Engn Dept, Pristina 10000, Kosovo
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2022年 / 12卷 / 11期
关键词
crop growth stages; reference evapotranspiration; pan evaporation; irrigation scheduling; crop evapotranspiration; INDO-GANGETIC PLAINS; PAN EVAPORATION DATA; WATER PRODUCTIVITY; RAISED BEDS; IRRIGATION; WHEAT; BALANCE; DRY; REQUIREMENTS; CLIMATE;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy12112850
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Lysimetric and eddy covariance techniques are commonly used to directly estimate actual crop evapotranspiration (ETa). However, these technologies are costly, laborious, and require skills which make in situ ET estimation difficult, particularly in developing countries. With this in mind, an attempt was made to determine ETa and stagewise crop coefficient (K-c) values of transplanted puddled rice using a modified non-weighing paddy lysimeter. The results were compared to indirect methods, viz., FAO Penman-Monteith and pan evaporation. Daily ETa ranged from 1.9 to 8.2 mmday(-1), with a mean of 4.02 +/- 1.35 mmday(-1), and their comparison showed that the FAO Penman-Monteith equation performed well for the coefficient of determination (R-2 of 0.63), root mean squared error (RMSE = 0.80), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE = 13.6 %), and was highly correlated with ETa throughout the crop season. However, the pan evaporation approach was underestimated (R-2 of 0.24; RMSE = 0.98; MAPE = 22.13%) due to a consistent pan coefficient value (0.71), vegetation role and measurement errors. In addition, actual K-c values were obtained as 1.13 +/- 0.13, 1.27 +/- 0.2, 1.23 +/- 0.16, and 0.93 +/- 0.18 for the initial, crop development, mid-season, and end-season stages, respectively. These estimated crop coefficient values were higher than FAO K-c values. Statistical analysis results revealed that the overall stagewise-derived average K-c values were in line with FAO values, but different from the derived pan K-c values, although found insignificant at a 5% significance level. In addition, water productivity and agro-meteorological indices were derived to evaluate the cultivar performance in this experiment. Therefore, such a methodology may be used in the absence of weighing lysimeter-derived K-c values. The derived regional K-c values can be applied to improve irrigation scheduling under similar agro-climatic conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [1] Actual evapotranspiration and dual crop coefficients for dry-seeded rice and hybrid maize grown with overhead sprinkler irrigation
    Alberto, Ma. Carmelita R.
    Quilty, James R.
    Buresh, Roland J.
    Wassmann, Reiner
    Haidar, Sam
    Correa, Teodoro Q., Jr.
    Sandro, Joseph M.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2014, 136 : 1 - 12
  • [2] Comparisons of energy balance and evapotranspiration between flooded and aerobic rice fields in the Philippines
    Alberto, Ma Carmelita R.
    Wassmann, Reiner
    Hirano, Takashi
    Miyata, Akira
    Hatano, Ryusuke
    Kumar, Arvind
    Padre, Agnes
    Amante, Modesto
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2011, 98 (09) : 1417 - 1430
  • [3] Increasing water productivity in crop production-A synthesis
    Ali, M. H.
    Talukder, M. S. U.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2008, 95 (11) : 1201 - 1213
  • [4] Allen R., 1998, FAO IRRIGATION DRAIN, V56, P26
  • [5] A recommendation on standardized surface resistance for hourly calculation of reference ETO by the FAO56 Penman-Monteith method
    Allen, RG
    Pruitt, WO
    Wright, JL
    Howell, TA
    Ventura, F
    Snyder, R
    Itenfisu, D
    Steduto, P
    Berengena, J
    Yrisarry, JB
    Smith, M
    Pereira, LS
    Raes, D
    Perrier, A
    Alves, I
    Walter, I
    Elliott, R
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2006, 81 (1-2) : 1 - 22
  • [6] Evapotranspiration estimation by inverse soil water flow modelling
    Angaleeswari, M.
    Ravikumar, V.
    Kannan, S. Vallal
    [J]. IRRIGATION SCIENCE, 2021, 39 (05) : 633 - 649
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2018, World Water Development Report 2018 | UN-Water
  • [8] Arif C., 2012, Journal of Agronomy, V11, P53, DOI 10.3923/ja.2012.53.59
  • [9] Estimating Crop Coefficient in Intermittent Irrigation Paddy Fields Using Excel Solver
    Arif, Chusnul
    Setiawan, Budi Indra
    Sofiyuddin, Hanhan Ahmad
    Martief, Lolly Martina
    Mizoguchi, Masaru
    Doi, Ryoichi
    [J]. RICE SCIENCE, 2012, 19 (02) : 143 - 152
  • [10] Babaee M, 2019, ING UC, V26, P175