Urothelial carcinoma in bladder diverticula: outcomes after radical cystectomy

被引:17
作者
Hu, Brian [1 ]
Satkunasivam, Raj [1 ]
Schuckman, Anne [1 ]
Miranda, Gus [1 ]
Cai, Jie [1 ]
Daneshmand, Siamak [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Norris Comprehens Canc Ctr, USC Inst Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
关键词
Diverticulum; Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder; Radical cystectomy; Survival; VESICAL DIVERTICULA; NEOPLASMS;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-014-1472-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To characterize the clinical and pathologic staging of patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC) in bladder diverticula (BD) after undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) and determine the impact of UCBD on recurrence and survival. We reviewed our institutional database of patients who underwent RC for UC (1971-2009). Outcomes were compared between patients with and without UCBD. Kaplan-Meier curves estimated recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox regression evaluated associations between UCBD and survival. Inclusion criteria were met in 1991 patients. UCBD was seen in 77 (4 %) patients and occurred exclusively in men (mean age 68 +/- A 8.5 years). The highest pathologic stage tumor was found in the BD in 44 (57 %) of these patients. Pathologic upstaging was more common with UCBD compared with UC not in BD (48 vs. 39 %, p = 0.031). On univariate analysis, no differences in RFS or OS were observed comparing patients with or without UCBD stratified by clinically organ-confined (a parts per thousand currency signT2) and extravesical (> T2) disease. On multivariable analysis, the presence of UCBD was not associated with differences in RFS (HR 0.92, 95 % CI 0.59-1.42, p = 0.69) or OS (HR 0.98, 95 % CI 0.74-1.31, p = 0.92). Upstaging was common in patients with UCBD, observed in almost half of the patients. There were no differences in RFS or OS after RC when comparing patients with or without UC in a diverticulum stratified by stage.
引用
收藏
页码:1397 / 1402
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Primary transitional cell carcinoma in vesical diverticula [J].
Baniel, J ;
Vishna, T .
UROLOGY, 1997, 50 (05) :697-699
[2]   VESICAL DIVERTICULUM ASSOCIATED WITH BLADDER-CARCINOMA - THERAPEUTIC IMPLICATIONS [J].
DAS, S ;
AMAR, AD .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1986, 136 (05) :1013-1014
[3]   PRIMARY NEOPLASM IN VESICAL DIVERTICULA - A REPORT OF 12 CASES [J].
FAYSAL, MH ;
FREIHA, FS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1981, 53 (02) :141-143
[4]  
Fellows F J, 1978, Eur Urol, V4, P185
[5]  
Garzotto MG, 1996, J SURG ONCOL, V62, P46, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199605)62:1<46::AID-JSO10>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-R
[7]   10-YEAR REVIEW OF VESICAL DIVERTICULA [J].
GERRIDZEN, RG ;
FUTTER, NG .
UROLOGY, 1982, 20 (01) :33-35
[8]   Carcinoma in a bladder diverticulum: Presentation and treatment outcome [J].
Golijanin, D ;
Yossepowitch, O ;
Beck, SD ;
Sogani, P ;
Dalbagni, G .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (05) :1761-1764
[9]   TREATMENT OF DIVERTICULUM OF BLADDER [J].
KELALIS, PP ;
MCLEAN, P .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1967, 98 (03) :349-&
[10]   PRIMARY NEOPLASMA OCCURRING IN VESICAL DIVERTICULA - A REPORT OF 18 CASES [J].
KNAPPENBERGER, ST ;
USON, AC ;
MELICOW, MM .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1960, 83 (02) :153-159