Antibiotic prophylaxis for hysterectomy, a prospective cohort study: cefuroxime, metronidazole, or both?

被引:13
|
作者
Brummer, T. H. I. [1 ]
Heikkinen, A-M [2 ]
Jalkanen, J. [3 ]
Fraser, J. [4 ]
Makinen, J. [5 ]
Tomas, E. [6 ]
Seppala, T. [7 ]
Sjoberg, J. [1 ]
Harkki, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Helsinki Univ Cent Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, SF-70210 Kuopio, Finland
[3] Cent Finland Cent Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Jyvaskyla, Finland
[4] North Karelia Cent Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Joensuu, Finland
[5] Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland
[6] Tampere Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Tampere, Finland
[7] Aalto Univ Sch Econ, Dept Informat & Serv Management, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Antibiotic prophylaxis; cefuroxime; hysterectomy; metronidazole; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY; RISK-FACTORS; BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS; INFECTIONS; COMPLICATIONS; PREVENTION; MORBIDITY; FINHYST;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.12178
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate cefuroxime and metronidazole antibiotic prophylaxis. Design Observational nonrandomised 1-year prospective cohort study. Setting Fifty-three hospitals in Finland. Population A total of 5279 women undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications, with cefuroxime given to 4301 and metronidazole given to 2855. Excluding other antibiotics, cefuroxime alone was given to 2019, metronidazole alone was given to 518, and they were administered in combination to 2252 women. Methods Data on 1115 abdominal hysterectomies (AHs), 1541 laparoscopic hysterectomies (LHs), and 2133 vaginal hysterectomies (VHs) were analysed using logistic regression adjusted for confounding factors. Main outcome measures Postoperative infections. Results Cefuroxime had a risk-reductive effect for total infections (adjusted odds ratio, OR, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI, 0.22-0.39), but the independent effect of metronidazole and the interaction effect of cefuroxime and metronidazole were nonsignificant. In subgroup analyses of AHs, LHs, and VHs involving those receiving the two main antibiotics only, the effect of cefuroxime alone nonsignificantly differed from that of cefuroxime and metronidazole in combination for all types of infection. The absence of cefuroxime, assessed by comparing metronidazole alone with cefuroxime and metronidazole in combination, led to an increased risk for total infections in AHs (adjusted OR 3.63; 95% CI 1.99-6.65), in LHs (OR 3.53; 95% CI 1.74-7.18), and in VHs (OR 4.05; 95% CI 2.30-7.13), and also increased risks for febrile events in all categories (AHs, OR 2.86; 95% CI 1.09-7.46; LHs, OR 13.19; 95% CI 3.66-47.49; VHs, OR 12.74; 95% CI 3.01-53.95), wound infections in AHs (OR 6.88; 95% CI 1.09-7.49), and pelvic infections in VHs (OR 4.26; 95% CI 1.76-10.31). Conclusions In this study, cefuroxime appeared to be effective in prophylaxis against infections. Metronidazole appeared to be ineffective, with no additional risk-reductive effect when combined with cefuroxime.
引用
收藏
页码:1269 / 1276
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Antibiotic prophylaxis in prostatic surgery: Adherence to the hospital protocol. Prospective cohort study
    Alonso-Garcia, Marcos
    Manuel De-la-Morena, Jose
    Carrera-Puerta, Cesar
    Covele Lucas, Warren
    Nontero-Morales, Laura
    Antonio Del-Moral-Luque, Juan
    Isabel Hijas-Gomez, Ana
    Concepcion Villar-del-Campos, Maria
    Rodriguez-Caravaca, Gil
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2019, 72 (10): : 985 - 991
  • [22] Antibiotic prophylaxis during clean neurosurgery: A large, multicenter study using cefuroxime
    Holloway, KL
    Smith, KW
    Wilberger, JE
    Jemsek, JG
    Giguere, GC
    Collins, JJ
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1996, 18 (01) : 84 - 94
  • [23] ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS FOR ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY
    DUFF, P
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1982, 60 (01): : 25 - 29
  • [24] PERIOPERATIVE ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS IN HYSTERECTOMY
    WILKEN, H
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR GYNAKOLOGIE, 1990, 112 (11): : 657 - 658
  • [25] SINGLE DOSE CEFOTAXIME PLUS METRONIDAZOLE VERSUS 3 DOSE CEFUROXIME PLUS METRONIDAZOLE AS PROPHYLAXIS AGAINST WOUND-INFECTION IN COLORECTAL SURGERY - MULTICENTER PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY
    ROWEJONES, DC
    PEEL, ALG
    KINGSTON, RD
    SHAW, JFL
    TEASDALE, C
    COLE, DS
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1990, 300 (6716): : 18 - 22
  • [26] The association of hysterectomy and menopause: a prospective cohort study
    Farquhar, CM
    Sadler, L
    Harvey, SA
    Stewart, AW
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 112 (07) : 956 - 962
  • [27] Antibiotic prophylaxis in septorhinoplasty? A prospective, randomized study
    Rajan, GP
    Fergie, N
    Fischer, U
    Romer, M
    Radivojevic, V
    Hee, GK
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 116 (07) : 1995 - 1998
  • [28] A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL TO COMPARE TRIPLE DOSE MEZLOCILLIN WITH TRIPLE DOSE CEFUROXIME PLUS METRONIDAZOLE AS PROPHYLAXIS IN COLORECTAL SURGERY
    DIAMOND, T
    MULHOLLAND, CK
    HANNA, WA
    PARKS, TG
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1988, 12 (03) : 215 - 219
  • [29] ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS IN PULMONARY SURGERY - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL OF FLASH CEFUROXIME VERSUS 48-HOUR CEFUROXIME
    BERNARD, A
    PILLET, M
    GOUDET, P
    VIARD, H
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1994, 107 (03): : 896 - 900
  • [30] Infection after elective colorectal surgery: a randomized trial of prophylaxis with cefuroxime and metronidazole versus cefotaxime and metronidazole
    Belagyi, T
    Hegedus, L
    Wellner, I
    Ladocsi, B
    Olah, A
    EUROPEAN COUNCIL OF COLOPROCTOLOGY - ECCP BIENNIAL MEETING, 1997, : 187 - 189