Cost function approach to water protection in forestry

被引:5
作者
Miettinen, Jenni [1 ]
Ollikainen, Markku [1 ]
Nieminen, Mika [2 ]
Valsta, Lauri [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Econ & Management, POB 27, Helsinki 00014, Finland
[2] Nat Resources Inst Finland, Latokartanonkaari 9, Helsinki 00790, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, Dept Forest Sci, POB 27, Helsinki 00014, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Ditch cleaning; Clear-cutting; Nutrient load; Sediment load; Buffer zone; Overland flow field; DITCH NETWORK MAINTENANCE; DIFFUSE LOAD ABATEMENT; BUFFER ZONES; NUTRIENT ABATEMENT; TIMBER PRODUCTION; PHOSPHORUS LOADS; ROTATION AGE; NITROGEN; QUALITY; PEATLANDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.wre.2019.100150
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The European Water Framework Directive (WFD) strongly emphasizes that all water polluting sectors must enhance the protection of water bodies in a cost-effective way. River Basin Management Plans need to be made to achieve a good environmental status for all water bodies by 2027 at the latest. This article examines three principal water protection measures used in forestry: buffer zones, overland flow fields and sedimentation ponds. We analytically develop marginal abatement cost functions for each of these measures and apply them numerically for the Finnish forestry. We find that the marginal abatement costs of nutrients using buffer zones in clear-cut mineral soil forests are very high, as they entail leaving financially mature and uncut trees. In contrast, the marginal costs of using overland flow fields in conjunction with ditch cleaning and clear-cutting in peatlands are very low. Furthermore, for sediments using overland flow fields as a water protection measure entails significantly lower abatement costs than does using sedimentation ponds in conjunction with ditch cleaning in peatland forests. A cost-effective solution in a river basin entails that the highest nutrient reductions are made in agriculture but that forestry also does its share. A cost-effective allocation of abatement measures entails that the proportions of the overall nutrient reduction are 3% (1%) in forestry and 97% (99%) in agriculture when the reduction target is set as 10% (30%).
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [1] Ahtiainen Marketta, 1999, Boreal Environment Research, V4, P101
  • [2] AMACHER GS, 1991, FOREST SCI, V37, P1099
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2018, STOP SMOKING INTERVE, P1
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2012, PEATLAND ECOLOGY FOR
  • [5] Baumol W.J., 1988, THEORY ENV POLICY, P299
  • [6] CHANG SJ, 1983, FOREST SCI, V29, P267
  • [7] The economic value of a forested catchment with timber, water and carbon sequestration benefits
    Creedy, J
    Wurzbacher, AD
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 38 (01) : 71 - 83
  • [8] Cost-effectiveness of the Baltic Sea Action Plan
    Elofsson, Katarina
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2010, 34 (05) : 1043 - 1050
  • [9] Implications for forest management of the EU Water Framework Directive's stream water quality requirements - A modeling approach
    Eriksson, Ljusk Ola
    Lofgren, Stefan
    Ohman, Karin
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2011, 13 (04) : 284 - 291
  • [10] Finer L., 2018, VESITALOUS 22018, P10