What is the Prostate Specific Antigen Cut-off Value to Detect Metastases in Ga-68 Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography/Computer Tomography Imaging for Intermediate and High-risk Prostate Cancer?

被引:1
|
作者
Kopru, Burak [1 ]
Ebiloglu, Turgay [2 ]
Kaya, Engin [2 ]
Alagoz, Engin [3 ]
Zor, Murat [2 ]
Emer, Mustafa Ozdes [3 ]
Gurdal, Mesut [2 ]
Bedir, Selahattin [2 ]
Arslan, Nuri [3 ]
机构
[1] Koru Ankara Hosp, Clin Urol, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Gulhane Training & Res Hosp, Clin Urol, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Gulhane Training & Res Hosp, Clin Nucl Med, Ankara, Turkey
来源
UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY | 2020年 / 19卷 / 03期
关键词
PSA; prostate cancer; Ga-68 PSMA ligand PET/CT; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; PET/CT; SERUM;
D O I
10.4274/uob.galenos.2020.1499
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to detect a prostate specific antigen (PSA) cut-off value for metastases, and prevent unnecessary use of Ga-68 prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand positron emission tomography/computer tomography (CT) imaging. Materials and Methods: Between January 2016 and October 2017, patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who were staged using Ga-68 PSMA enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (G1) had Ga-68 PSMA for primary staging, and group 2 (G2) had Ga-68 PSMA for detection of metastases after treatment (secondary staging). PSA cut-off values were calculated for general, bone, lymph node and visceral metastases. Results: A total of 181 patients were included in this study. PSA cut-off was 7.5 ng/mL for overall metastases in general. The PSA cut-offs for overall metastases using initial PSA were 8.98 ng/mL and 6.82 ng/mL for G1 and G2, respectively. For G2 patients the post-treatment PSA cut-off was 0.38 ng/mL. For bone metastases, the PSA cut-offs using initial PSA were 8.98 ng/mL and 10.7 ng/mL for G1 and G2, respectively. For lymph node metastases, the PSA cut-offs using initial PSA were 8.98 ng/mL and 6.71 ng/mL for G1 and G2, respectively. For visceral metastases, the PSA cut-offs using initial PSA were 16.4 ng/mL and 7.08 ng/ mL for G1 and G2, respectively. The same analyses could not be calculated in subgroups of G2 due to small sample size. Conclusion: These cut-off values do not suggest that Ga-68 PSMA is superior to using both CT and bone scintigraphy. It is an expensive test and its use is only reasonable when small lymph node metastases cannot be evaluated in CT.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 156
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictors of Positive 68Ga-Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Perera, Marlon
    Papa, Nathan
    Christidis, Daniel
    Wetherell, David
    Hofman, Michael S.
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Bolton, Damien
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 70 (06) : 926 - 937
  • [42] Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging with 68Gallium-labeled ligand of prostate-specific membrane antigen: Promising novel option in prostate cancer imaging?
    Maurer, Tobias
    Beer, Ambros J.
    Wester, Hans-Juergen
    Kuebler, Hubert
    Schwaiger, Markus
    Eiber, Matthias
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 21 (12) : 1286 - 1288
  • [43] New frontiers in focal therapy for prostate cancer: Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging
    Manfredi, Celeste
    Fernandez-Pascual, Esau
    Linares-Espinos, Estefania
    Counago, Felipe
    Martinez-Salamanca, Juan Ignacio
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 12 (02): : 61 - 68
  • [44] Oligometastasis to testis in prostate cancer: Role of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography computed tomography
    Gupta, Manoj
    Choudhury, Partha Sarathi
    Rawal, Sudhir
    Singh, Amitabh
    WORLD JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 20 (01) : 113 - 116
  • [45] Comparison of 68Ga-labeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ling, Sui Wai
    de Jong, Anouk C.
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    Nasserinejad, Kazem
    Busstra, Martijn B.
    van der Veldt, Astrid A. M.
    Brabander, Tessa
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2021, 33 : 61 - 71
  • [46] Gallium-68 Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer Trial (PASPoRT)
    Heetman, Joris G.
    Lavalaye, Jules
    Polm, Pepijn D.
    Soeterik, Timo F. W.
    Wever, Lieke
    Pereira, Leonor J. Paulino
    van der Hoeven, Erik J. R. J.
    van Melick, Harm H. E.
    van den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2024, 7 (02): : 204 - 210
  • [47] Prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in primary prostate cancer diagnosis: First-line imaging is afoot
    Jiao, Jianhua
    Zhang, Jingliang
    Li, Zeyu
    Wen, Weihong
    Cui, Chaochao
    Zhang, Qiang
    Wang, Jing
    Qin, Weijun
    CANCER LETTERS, 2022, 548
  • [48] Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in prostate cancer: a step toward personalized medicine
    Bouchelouche, Kirsten
    Choyke, Peter L.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY, 2016, 28 (03) : 216 - 221
  • [49] How does 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography impact the management of patients with prostate cancer recurrence after surgery?
    Bianchi, Lorenzo
    Schiavina, Riccardo
    Borghesi, Marco
    Ceci, Francesco
    Angiolini, Andrea
    Chessa, Francesco
    Droghetti, Matteo
    Bertaccini, Alessandro
    Manferrari, Fabio
    Marcelli, Emanuela
    Cochetti, Giovanni
    Porreca, Angelo
    Castellucci, Paolo
    Fanti, Stefano
    Brunocilla, Eugenio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 (08) : 804 - 811
  • [50] Clinical Translation of Positive Metastases Identified on Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging in the Management of De Novo Synchronous Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer
    Connor, Martin J.
    Dubash, Suraiya
    Bass, Edward J.
    Tam, Henry
    Barwick, Tara
    Khoo, Vincent
    Winkler, Mathias
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2021, 7 (05): : 951 - 954