What is the Prostate Specific Antigen Cut-off Value to Detect Metastases in Ga-68 Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography/Computer Tomography Imaging for Intermediate and High-risk Prostate Cancer?

被引:1
|
作者
Kopru, Burak [1 ]
Ebiloglu, Turgay [2 ]
Kaya, Engin [2 ]
Alagoz, Engin [3 ]
Zor, Murat [2 ]
Emer, Mustafa Ozdes [3 ]
Gurdal, Mesut [2 ]
Bedir, Selahattin [2 ]
Arslan, Nuri [3 ]
机构
[1] Koru Ankara Hosp, Clin Urol, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Gulhane Training & Res Hosp, Clin Urol, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Gulhane Training & Res Hosp, Clin Nucl Med, Ankara, Turkey
来源
UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY | 2020年 / 19卷 / 03期
关键词
PSA; prostate cancer; Ga-68 PSMA ligand PET/CT; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; PET/CT; SERUM;
D O I
10.4274/uob.galenos.2020.1499
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to detect a prostate specific antigen (PSA) cut-off value for metastases, and prevent unnecessary use of Ga-68 prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand positron emission tomography/computer tomography (CT) imaging. Materials and Methods: Between January 2016 and October 2017, patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who were staged using Ga-68 PSMA enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (G1) had Ga-68 PSMA for primary staging, and group 2 (G2) had Ga-68 PSMA for detection of metastases after treatment (secondary staging). PSA cut-off values were calculated for general, bone, lymph node and visceral metastases. Results: A total of 181 patients were included in this study. PSA cut-off was 7.5 ng/mL for overall metastases in general. The PSA cut-offs for overall metastases using initial PSA were 8.98 ng/mL and 6.82 ng/mL for G1 and G2, respectively. For G2 patients the post-treatment PSA cut-off was 0.38 ng/mL. For bone metastases, the PSA cut-offs using initial PSA were 8.98 ng/mL and 10.7 ng/mL for G1 and G2, respectively. For lymph node metastases, the PSA cut-offs using initial PSA were 8.98 ng/mL and 6.71 ng/mL for G1 and G2, respectively. For visceral metastases, the PSA cut-offs using initial PSA were 16.4 ng/mL and 7.08 ng/ mL for G1 and G2, respectively. The same analyses could not be calculated in subgroups of G2 due to small sample size. Conclusion: These cut-off values do not suggest that Ga-68 PSMA is superior to using both CT and bone scintigraphy. It is an expensive test and its use is only reasonable when small lymph node metastases cannot be evaluated in CT.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 156
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Gallium-68-prostate-specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) predicts complete biochemical response from radical prostatectomy and lymph node dissection in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer
    van Leeuwen, Pim J.
    Donswijk, Maarten
    Nandurkar, Rohan
    Stricker, Phillip
    Ho, Bao
    Heijmink, Stijn
    Wit, Esther M. K.
    Tillier, Corinne
    van Muilenkom, Erik
    Quoc Nguyen
    van der Poel, Henk G.
    Emmett, Louise
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 124 (01) : 62 - 68
  • [32] Diagnostic Accuracy of a Combination of Preoperative 68-Ga Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Localized Prostate Cancer
    Simsek, Alper
    Celen, Sinan
    Duran, Mesut Berkan
    Kucuker, Kursat
    Yagci, Ahmet Baki
    Turk, Nilay Sen
    Yuksel, Dogangun
    Turan, Tahir
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2024, 108 (04) : 277 - 284
  • [33] [68Ga]PSMA-11 for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive lesions in men with prostate cancer
    Clore, Jessica
    Scott, Peter J. H.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, : 565 - 582
  • [34] Accuracy of 68Ga-Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography for the Detection of Lymph Node Metastases Before Salvage Lymphadenectomy
    Mandel, Philipp
    Tilki, Derya
    Chun, Felix K.
    Pristupa, Eugenia
    Graefen, Markus
    Klutmann, Susanne
    Budaeus, Lars
    Steuber, Thomas
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2020, 6 (01): : 71 - 73
  • [35] Clinical impact of 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with prostate cancer with rising prostate-specific antigen after treatment with curative intent: preliminary analysis of a multidisciplinary approach
    Albisinni, Simone
    Artigas, Carlos
    Aoun, Fouad
    Biaou, Ibrahim
    Grosman, Julien
    Gil, Thierry
    Hawaux, Eric
    Limani, Ksenija
    Otte, Francois-Xavier
    Peltier, Alexandre
    Sideris, Spyridon
    Sirtaine, Nicolas
    Flamen, Patrick
    van Velthoven, Roland
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 120 (02) : 197 - 203
  • [36] New frontiers in prostate cancer imaging: clinical utility of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography
    Afaq, Asim
    Batura, Deepak
    Bomanji, Jamshed
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2017, 49 (05) : 803 - 810
  • [37] Case - Prostate-specific antigen bounce: A pitfall in prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography interpretation
    Pedro, Victor Polins
    Sistani, Golmehr
    Rachinsky, Irina
    Zukotynski, Katherine
    Bauman, Glenn
    Liu, Wei
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2021, 15 (11): : E620 - E621
  • [38] Prospective evaluation of 68Gallium-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography for preoperative lymph node staging in prostate cancer
    van Leeuwen, Pim J.
    Emmett, Louise
    Ho, Bao
    Delprado, Warick
    Ting, Francis
    Quoc Nguyen
    Stricker, Phillip D.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 119 (02) : 209 - 215
  • [39] Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography in Men with Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
    Fendler, Wolfgang P.
    Weber, Manuel
    Iravani, Amir
    Hofman, Michael S.
    Calais, Jeremie
    Czernin, Johannes
    Ilhan, Harun
    Saad, Fred
    Small, Eric J.
    Smith, Matthew R.
    Perez, Paola M.
    Hope, Thomas A.
    Rauscher, Isabel
    Londhe, Anil
    Lopez-Gitlitz, Angela
    Cheng, Shinta
    Maurer, Tobias
    Herrmann, Ken
    Eiber, Matthias
    Hadaschik, Boris
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 25 (24) : 7448 - 7454
  • [40] The Probability of Metastases Within Different Prostate-specific Antigen Ranges Using Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer
    Luining, Wietske I.
    Hagens, Marinus J.
    Meijer, Dennie
    Ringia, Joanneke B.
    de Weijer, Tessa
    Bektas, Huseyyin O.
    Ettema, Rosemarijn H.
    Knol, Remco J. J.
    Roeleveld, Ton A.
    Srbljin, Sandra
    Weltings, Saskia
    Koppes, Jose C. C.
    Moorselaar, Reindert J. A. van
    van Leeuwen, Pim J.
    Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.
    Vis, AndreN.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2024, 59 : 55 - 62