What is the Prostate Specific Antigen Cut-off Value to Detect Metastases in Ga-68 Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography/Computer Tomography Imaging for Intermediate and High-risk Prostate Cancer?

被引:1
|
作者
Kopru, Burak [1 ]
Ebiloglu, Turgay [2 ]
Kaya, Engin [2 ]
Alagoz, Engin [3 ]
Zor, Murat [2 ]
Emer, Mustafa Ozdes [3 ]
Gurdal, Mesut [2 ]
Bedir, Selahattin [2 ]
Arslan, Nuri [3 ]
机构
[1] Koru Ankara Hosp, Clin Urol, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Gulhane Training & Res Hosp, Clin Urol, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Gulhane Training & Res Hosp, Clin Nucl Med, Ankara, Turkey
来源
UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY | 2020年 / 19卷 / 03期
关键词
PSA; prostate cancer; Ga-68 PSMA ligand PET/CT; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; PET/CT; SERUM;
D O I
10.4274/uob.galenos.2020.1499
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to detect a prostate specific antigen (PSA) cut-off value for metastases, and prevent unnecessary use of Ga-68 prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand positron emission tomography/computer tomography (CT) imaging. Materials and Methods: Between January 2016 and October 2017, patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who were staged using Ga-68 PSMA enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (G1) had Ga-68 PSMA for primary staging, and group 2 (G2) had Ga-68 PSMA for detection of metastases after treatment (secondary staging). PSA cut-off values were calculated for general, bone, lymph node and visceral metastases. Results: A total of 181 patients were included in this study. PSA cut-off was 7.5 ng/mL for overall metastases in general. The PSA cut-offs for overall metastases using initial PSA were 8.98 ng/mL and 6.82 ng/mL for G1 and G2, respectively. For G2 patients the post-treatment PSA cut-off was 0.38 ng/mL. For bone metastases, the PSA cut-offs using initial PSA were 8.98 ng/mL and 10.7 ng/mL for G1 and G2, respectively. For lymph node metastases, the PSA cut-offs using initial PSA were 8.98 ng/mL and 6.71 ng/mL for G1 and G2, respectively. For visceral metastases, the PSA cut-offs using initial PSA were 16.4 ng/mL and 7.08 ng/ mL for G1 and G2, respectively. The same analyses could not be calculated in subgroups of G2 due to small sample size. Conclusion: These cut-off values do not suggest that Ga-68 PSMA is superior to using both CT and bone scintigraphy. It is an expensive test and its use is only reasonable when small lymph node metastases cannot be evaluated in CT.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 156
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 68Ga-Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (pet) in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Matushita, Cristina S.
    Marques da Silva, Ana M.
    Schuck, Phelipi N.
    Bardisserotto, Matteo
    Piant, Diego B.
    Pereira, Jonatas L.
    Cerci, Juliano J.
    Coura-Filho, George B.
    Esteves, Fabio P.
    Amorim, Barbara J.
    Gomes, Gustavo, V
    Brito, Ana Emilia T.
    Bernardo, Wanderley M.
    Mundstock, Eduardo
    Fanti, Stefano
    Macedo, Bruna
    Roman, Diego H.
    Tem-Pass, Cinthia Scatolin
    Hochhegger, Bruno
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2021, 47 (04): : 705 - 729
  • [22] Upcoming Role of Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography in Detecting Occult Metastases in Prostate Cancer
    Gupta, Parul
    Mishra, Rohini
    Gupta, Manoj
    Choudhury, Partha Sarthi
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 34 (03): : 213 - 215
  • [23] Combined Utility of 68Ga-Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Prostate Biopsy Pathology
    Kalapara, Arveen A.
    Ballok, Zita E.
    Ramdave, Shakher
    O'Sullivan, Richard
    Ryan, Andrew
    Konety, Badrinath
    Grummet, Jeremy P.
    Frydenberg, Mark
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2022, 5 (03): : 314 - 320
  • [24] Predicting early outcomes in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer using prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
    Meijer, Dennie
    van Leeuwen, Pim J.
    Donswijk, Maarten L.
    Boellaard, Thierry N.
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    van der Poel, Henk G.
    Hendrikse, Harry N.
    Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.
    Vis, Andre N.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 129 (01) : 54 - 62
  • [25] Utility of Ga68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography for pre-operative staging of high-risk prostate cancer in a prospective cohort
    Tarr, Gregory Patrick
    Kashyap, Puja
    Dixit, Devesh Datta
    Willams, Andrew Keith
    Koya, Madhusudhan Prasad
    Lim, Remy
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 64 (01) : 78 - 86
  • [26] Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer Presenting as Solitary Testicular Metastasis on 68Ga-Labeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography
    Aktas, Gul Ege
    Caloglu, Vuslat Yurut
    Akdere, Hakan
    Tutug, Busem Binboga
    Altun, Guelay Durmus
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 43 (09) : 696 - 697
  • [27] Positron Emission Tomography-computed Tomography with Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligands as a Promising Tool for Imaging of Prostate Cancer
    Haberkorn, Uwe
    Kopka, Klaus
    Hadaschik, Boris
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (03) : 397 - 399
  • [28] Ga-68 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT: Imaging and Clinical Perspective in Prostate Cancer Imaging and Clinical Perspective in Prostate Cancer
    Puranik, Ameya D.
    Dev, Indraja D.
    PET CLINICS, 2022, 17 (04) : 595 - 606
  • [29] New frontiers in prostate cancer imaging: clinical utility of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography
    Asim Afaq
    Deepak Batura
    Jamshed Bomanji
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2017, 49 : 803 - 810
  • [30] What is the Prostate-Specific Antigen Cut-Off Value to Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer According to Age in Turkey?
    Ebiloglu, Turgay
    Kaya, Engin
    UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2018, 17 (02): : 49 - 53