What is the Prostate Specific Antigen Cut-off Value to Detect Metastases in Ga-68 Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography/Computer Tomography Imaging for Intermediate and High-risk Prostate Cancer?

被引:1
|
作者
Kopru, Burak [1 ]
Ebiloglu, Turgay [2 ]
Kaya, Engin [2 ]
Alagoz, Engin [3 ]
Zor, Murat [2 ]
Emer, Mustafa Ozdes [3 ]
Gurdal, Mesut [2 ]
Bedir, Selahattin [2 ]
Arslan, Nuri [3 ]
机构
[1] Koru Ankara Hosp, Clin Urol, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Gulhane Training & Res Hosp, Clin Urol, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Gulhane Training & Res Hosp, Clin Nucl Med, Ankara, Turkey
来源
UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY | 2020年 / 19卷 / 03期
关键词
PSA; prostate cancer; Ga-68 PSMA ligand PET/CT; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; PET/CT; SERUM;
D O I
10.4274/uob.galenos.2020.1499
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to detect a prostate specific antigen (PSA) cut-off value for metastases, and prevent unnecessary use of Ga-68 prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand positron emission tomography/computer tomography (CT) imaging. Materials and Methods: Between January 2016 and October 2017, patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who were staged using Ga-68 PSMA enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (G1) had Ga-68 PSMA for primary staging, and group 2 (G2) had Ga-68 PSMA for detection of metastases after treatment (secondary staging). PSA cut-off values were calculated for general, bone, lymph node and visceral metastases. Results: A total of 181 patients were included in this study. PSA cut-off was 7.5 ng/mL for overall metastases in general. The PSA cut-offs for overall metastases using initial PSA were 8.98 ng/mL and 6.82 ng/mL for G1 and G2, respectively. For G2 patients the post-treatment PSA cut-off was 0.38 ng/mL. For bone metastases, the PSA cut-offs using initial PSA were 8.98 ng/mL and 10.7 ng/mL for G1 and G2, respectively. For lymph node metastases, the PSA cut-offs using initial PSA were 8.98 ng/mL and 6.71 ng/mL for G1 and G2, respectively. For visceral metastases, the PSA cut-offs using initial PSA were 16.4 ng/mL and 7.08 ng/ mL for G1 and G2, respectively. The same analyses could not be calculated in subgroups of G2 due to small sample size. Conclusion: These cut-off values do not suggest that Ga-68 PSMA is superior to using both CT and bone scintigraphy. It is an expensive test and its use is only reasonable when small lymph node metastases cannot be evaluated in CT.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 156
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Information about Prostate Cancer for Urologist: Ga-68 Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Scintigraphy
    Kabasakal, Levent
    UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2016, 15 (04): : 159 - 162
  • [2] Spinal tuberculosis mimicking as prostate cancer metastases in Ga-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography/computed tomography
    Gupta, Nitin
    Elumalai, Ram Kumar
    Verma, Ritu
    Belho, Ethel Shangne
    Dhawan, Shashi
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (03): : 271 - 273
  • [3] Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography for staging of high-risk prostate cancer
    Petersen, Lars J.
    Zacho, Helle D.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 51 (06) : 498 - 501
  • [4] Incremental value of Ga-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen-11 positron-emission tomography/computed tomography scan for preoperative risk stratification of prostate cancer
    Pallavi, U. N.
    Gogoi, Sanjay
    Thakral, Parul
    Malasani, Vindhya
    Sharma, Kanchan
    Manda, Divya
    Das, Subha Shankar
    Pant, Vineet
    Sen, Ishita
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (02): : 93 - 99
  • [5] Initial experience of Ga-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in evaluation of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients
    Natarajan, Aravintho
    Agrawal, Archi
    Murthy, Vedang
    Bakshi, Ganesh
    Joshi, Amit
    Purandare, Nilendu
    Shah, Sneha
    Puranik, Ameya
    Rangarajan, Venkatesh
    WORLD JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 18 (03) : 244 - 250
  • [6] Research progress on prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand positron emission tomography imaging of prostate cancer
    Li Y.
    Liu B.
    Yuan Y.
    Qin W.
    Shengwu Yixue Gongchengxue Zazhi/Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2022, 39 (06): : 1263 - 1268
  • [7] 68Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) for primary staging of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review
    Corfield, Julia
    Perera, Marlon
    Bolton, Damien
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 36 (04) : 519 - 527
  • [8] Diagnostic performance of Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography in intermediate and high risk prostate cancer
    El Hajj, Albert
    Yacoub, Basel
    Mansour, Mazen
    Khauli, Raja
    Bulbul, Mohamad
    Nassif, Samer
    Haidar, Mohamad B.
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (44) : e17491
  • [9] 68Ga-Labeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    von Eyben, Finn E.
    Picchio, Maria
    von Eyben, Rie
    Rhee, Handoo
    Bauman, Glenn
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2018, 4 (05): : 686 - 693
  • [10] 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in advanced prostate cancer: Current state and future trends
    Udovicich, Cristian
    Perera, Marlon
    Hofman, Michael S.
    Siva, Shankar
    Del Rio, Andres
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 5 (04) : 125 - 129