Self-management intervention for chronic pain in older adults: A randomised controlled trial

被引:101
作者
Nicholas, Michael K. [1 ]
Asghari, Ali [1 ,2 ]
Blyth, Fiona M. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Wood, Bradley M. [1 ]
Murray, Robin [1 ]
McCabe, Rebecca [1 ]
Brnabic, Alan [5 ]
Beeston, Lee [1 ]
Corbett, Mandy [1 ]
Sherrington, Catherine [6 ]
Overton, Sarah [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Royal N Shore Hosp, Pain Management Res Inst, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Shahed Univ, Sch Psychol, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[4] Sax Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] ABC Consulting, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Univ Sydney, George Inst, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
Chronic pain; Older adults; CBT-based pain self-management; Randomised trial; ANXIETY STRESS SCALES; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL TREATMENT; LOW-BACK-PAIN; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; FEAR-AVOIDANCE; DEPRESSION; EFFICACY; EXERCISE; THERAPY; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.pain.2013.02.009
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
This study compared an outpatient pain self-management (PSM) program, using cognitive-behavioural therapy and exercises, with 2 control conditions in 141 chronic pain patients aged > 65 years. Results immediately posttreatment indicated that relative to the Exercise-Attention Control (EAC) group, the PSM group was significantly improved on measures of pain distress, disability, mood, unhelpful pain beliefs, and functional reach. The mean effect size for these gains was 0.52 (range: 0.44-0.68). By 1-month follow-up, relative to the EAC group, the PSM group remained better on most measures. At the 1-month follow-up, relative to a Waiting List (usual care) (WL) group, the PSM group was significantly improved on measures of pain distress, disability, and unhelpful pain beliefs. The mean effect size for these variables was 0.69 (range: 0.56-0.83). Relative to the WL group, the EAC group made no significant gains on any of the measured variables. At 1-month follow-up, the mean proportion of reliably improved cases (across outcome variables) was 41% (range: 16-60%) for the PSM group, twice that of those who met this criterion in the 2 control conditions (and this difference was statistically significant). Similarly, significantly more (44%) of the PSM group (vs 22% and 20% for the control groups) achieved a clinically significant improvement on pain disability. In the short term at least, cognitive-behavioural therapy-based PSM was more effective than exercises and usual care. (C) 2013 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:824 / 835
页数:12
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Statistics notes - How to randomise [J].
Altman, DG ;
Bland, JM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7211) :703-704
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, APPL MULTIPLE REGRES
[4]  
[Anonymous], J GERONTOL B
[5]  
[Anonymous], MANAGE YOUR PAIN
[6]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[7]   Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in clinical groups and a community sample [J].
Antony, MM ;
Bieling, PJ ;
Cox, BJ ;
Enns, MW ;
Swinson, RP .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1998, 10 (02) :176-181
[8]  
Armitage P., 2002, STAT METHODS MED RES
[9]   Pain self-efficacy beliefs and pain behaviour. A prospective study [J].
Asghari, A ;
Nicholas, MK .
PAIN, 2001, 94 (01) :85-100
[10]   Chronic pain in Australia: a prevalence study [J].
Blyth, FM ;
March, LM ;
Brnabic, AJM ;
Jorm, LR ;
Williamson, M ;
Cousins, MJ .
PAIN, 2001, 89 (2-3) :127-134