Readability Assessment of Online Urology Patient Education Materials

被引:97
作者
Colaco, Marc [1 ]
Svider, Peter F. [2 ]
Agarwal, Nitin [3 ]
Eloy, Jean Anderson [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Jackson, Imani M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Dept Surg, Div Urol, New Jersey Med Sch, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[2] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Dept Otolaryngol, New Jersey Med Sch, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[3] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Dept Neurol Surg, New Jersey Med Sch, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[4] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Neurol Inst New Jersey, Ctr Skull Base & Pituitary Surg, New Jersey Med Sch, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
关键词
urology; patient education as topic; Internet comprehension; reading; HEALTH LITERACY; INFORMATION; INTERNET; WEBSITES; SURGERY; QUALITY; FORMULA; ASTHMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.255
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The National Institutes of Health, American Medical Association, and United States Department of Health and Human Services recommend that patient education materials be written at a fourth to sixth grade reading level to facilitate comprehension. We examined and compared the readability and difficulty of online patient education materials from the American Urological Association and academic urology departments in the Northeastern United States. Materials and Methods: We assessed the online patient education materials for difficulty level with 10 commonly used readability assessment tools, including the Flesch Reading Ease Score, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, Gunning Frequency of Gobbledygook, New Dale-Chall Test, Coleman-Liau index, New Fog Count, Raygor Readability Estimate, FORCAST test and Fry score. Results: Most patient education materials on the websites of these programs were written at or above the eleventh grade reading level. Conclusions: Urological online patient education materials are written above the recommended reading level. They may need to be simplified to facilitate better patient understanding of urological topics.
引用
收藏
页码:1048 / 1052
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1977, READING THEORY RES P
[2]   Low Health Literacy and Health Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review [J].
Berkman, Nancy D. ;
Sheridan, Stacey L. ;
Donahue, Katrina E. ;
Halpern, David J. ;
Crotty, Karen .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 155 (02) :97-+
[3]   Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to endoscopic sinus surgery [J].
Cherla, Deepa V. ;
Sanghvi, Saurin ;
Choudhry, Osamah J. ;
Liu, James K. ;
Eloy, Jean Anderson .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2012, 122 (08) :1649-1654
[4]   COMPUTER READABILITY FORMULA DESIGNED FOR MACHINE SCORING [J].
COLEMAN, M ;
LIAU, TL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 60 (02) :283-284
[5]   The Impact of Health Literacy and Socioeconomic Status on Asthma Disparities [J].
Curtis, Laura M. ;
Wolf, Michael S. ;
Weiss, Kevin B. ;
Grammer, Leslie C. .
JOURNAL OF ASTHMA, 2012, 49 (02) :178-183
[6]   Understanding the Health Literacy of America Results of the National Assessment of Adult Literacy [J].
Cutilli, Carolyn Crane ;
Bennett, Ian M. .
ORTHOPAEDIC NURSING, 2009, 28 (01) :27-32
[7]   Readability Assessment of Patient Education Materials on Major Otolaryngology Association Websites [J].
Eloy, Jean Anderson ;
Li, Shawn ;
Kasabwala, Khushabu ;
Agarwal, Nitin ;
Hansberry, David R. ;
Baredes, Soly ;
Setzen, Michael .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2012, 147 (05) :848-854
[8]  
Fox Susannah., SOCIAL LIFE HLTH INF
[9]   Influence of Parental Health Literacy and Dosing Responsibility on Pediatric Glaucoma Medication Adherence [J].
Freedman, Rebecca B. ;
Jones, Sarah K. ;
Lin, Alice ;
Robin, Alan L. ;
Muir, Kelly W. .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 130 (03) :306-311
[10]   Do patient information booklets increase perioperative anxiety? [J].
Gillies, MAM ;
Baldwin, FJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2001, 18 (09) :620-622