Desecuritisation of water and the technocratic turn in peacebuilding

被引:26
作者
Aggestam, Karin [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Polit Sci, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Desecuritisation; Peacebuilding; Technocracy; Water; Politics; Conflict; Israeli-Palestinian conflict; MIDDLE-EAST; ISRAELI; SECURITY; SECURITIZATION; COOPERATION; COPENHAGEN; CONFLICT; POLITICS; POWER; WARS;
D O I
10.1007/s10784-015-9281-x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article addresses the research gap of water desecuritisation and advances an interdisciplinary approach within the issue area of peacebuilding. It draws upon three strands of research: security, peacebuilding and transboundary water management. The article examines three core questions: (1) how is desecuritisation conceptualised and understood in theory as well as within the context of water development; (2) in what ways are water conflict addressed within the liberal peacebuilding paradigm; and (3) what are the roles and implications of technocracy in resolving conflict and building peace? The article conducts a conceptual scoping, which critically probes what desecuritisation and peacebuilding do politically in the water sector. It draws empirical illustrations from the Israeli-Palestinian water conflict where water is securitised while major peacebuilding efforts have been made to desecuritise the conflict. It concludes that technical blueprints may run the risk of depoliticising conflict dynamics, which contradicts the normative assumption about desecuritisation as a return to normal politics. Moreover, the technocratic turn in peacebuilding practices have empowered certain actors, who act as the "new" peacemakers while others are marginalised.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 340
页数:14
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Abitbol E., 2009, Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, V5, P35
[2]   Disempowerment and marginalisation of peace NGOs: exposing peace gaps in Israel and Palestine [J].
Aggestam, Karin ;
Strombom, Lisa .
PEACEBUILDING, 2013, 1 (01) :109-124
[3]   Situating water in peacebuilding: revisiting the Middle East peace process [J].
Aggestam, Karin ;
Sundell-Eklund, Anna .
WATER INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 39 (01) :10-22
[4]   Questioning the water wars rationale: a case study of the Indus Waters Treaty [J].
Alam, UZ .
GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 168 :341-353
[5]   Towards a bio-territorial conception of power: Territory, population, and environmental narratives in Palestine and Israel [J].
Alatout, Samer .
POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY, 2006, 25 (06) :601-621
[6]   Water wars in the Middle East: a looming threat [J].
Amery, HA .
GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 168 :313-323
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1995, UN UNSC B BOUT UNPUB
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1966, INT LAW ASS 52 C HEL
[9]  
ARADAU Claudia., 2004, Journal ofInternational Relations and Development, V7, P388, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jird.1800030, DOI 10.1057/PALGRAVE.JIRD.1800030]
[10]   Water worlds: Introduction to the special issue of Social Studies of Science [J].
Barnes, Jessica ;
Alatout, Samer .
SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 2012, 42 (04) :483-488