Trade openness and pollutant emissions in China: the role of capital abundance and income

被引:5
作者
Peng, Xin [1 ]
Pu, Yue [2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Econ, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Int Business, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Trade openness; Pollutant emissions; Capital abundance; Income; Elasticity; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; CO2; EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENT; AGREEMENTS;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-020-09894-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The role of capital abundance and income in the trade openness and environmental quality debate has long been a concern among academic researchers. The researchers of this paper empirically analyze the effects of trade and other core factors on emissions of four pollutants (SO2, SM, VOC, and NHX), using panel data from 31 provinces in China from 2000 to 2015. Then the scale, composition, technique, and trade elasticities are calculated, based on lower and higher levels of capital abundance and relative income. Furthermore, the researchers calculate the province-specific trade elasticities and analyze the relationship between the province-specific trade elasticities and capital abundance and relative income, respectively. They find a negative effect of trade openness on pollutant emissions in China. The analysis of the elasticities in terms of China's pollutant emissions shows that the scale and composition elasticities are positive, while technique and trade elasticities are negative. Moreover, provinces with lower capital abundance tend to have more negative trade elasticities, while provinces with higher relative income tend to have more negative trade elasticities. The result implies that both pollution haven effect and factor abundance effect may be at work in Chinese provinces, but the dominance of one effect over the other depends on a province's level of capital abundance and income.
引用
收藏
页码:35661 / 35674
页数:14
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Is free trade good for the environment? [J].
Antweiler, W ;
Copeland, BR ;
Taylor, MS .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (04) :877-908
[2]   TRADE OPENNESS AND CO2 EMISSIONS IN TUNISIA [J].
Chebbi, Houssem Eddine ;
Olarreaga, Marcelo ;
Zitouna, Habib .
MIDDLE EAST DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL, 2011, 3 (01) :29-53
[3]   Trade liberalization and the environment: Evidence from NAFTA and US manufacturing [J].
Cherniwchan, Jevan .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 105 :130-149
[4]   Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental kuznets curve: examining the linkages [J].
Cole, MA .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 48 (01) :71-81
[5]   Determining the trade-environment composition effect: the role of capital, labor and environmental regulations [J].
Cole, MA ;
Elliott, RJR .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 46 (03) :363-383
[6]  
Cole MA, 2010, ECOL ECON, V69, P97
[7]   PRODUCTIVITY, EXPORT, AND ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE: AIR POLLUTANTS IN THE UNITED STATES [J].
Cui, Jingbo ;
Lapan, Harvey ;
Moschini, Giancarlo .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 98 (02) :447-467
[8]   International Trade in Used Vehicles: The Environmental Consequences of NAFTA [J].
Davis, Lucas W. ;
Kahn, Matthew E. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2010, 2 (04) :58-82
[9]   Does trade liberalization harm the environment? A new test [J].
Dean, JM .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2002, 35 (04) :819-842
[10]  
Dean JM, 2010, FEENSTRA RC, P429