Symbolic interpretation of artificial neural networks

被引:124
|
作者
Taha, IA [1 ]
Ghosh, J
机构
[1] Mil Tech Coll, Dept Comp & Operat Res, Cairo, Egypt
[2] Univ Texas, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
rule extraction; hybrid systems; knowledge refinement; neural networks; rule evaluation;
D O I
10.1109/69.774103
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Hybrid Intelligent Systems that combine knowledge-based and artificial neural network systems typically have four phases involving domain knowledge representation. mapping of this knowledge into an initial connectionist architecture. network training, and rule extraction, respectively. The final phase is important because it can provide a trained connectionist architecture with explanation power and validate its output decisions. Moreover, it can be used to refine and maintain the initial knowledge acquired from domain experts. In this paper, we present three rule-extraction techniques. The first technique extracts a set of binary rules from any type of neural network. The other two techniques are specific to feedforward networks, with a single hidden layer of sigmoidal units. Technique 2 extracts partial rules that represent the most important embedded knowledge with an adjustable level of detail, while the third technique provides a more comprehensive and universal approach. A rule-evaluation technique, which orders extracted rules based on three performance measures, is then proposed. The three techniques area applied to the iris and breast cancer data sets. The extracted rules are evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively, and are compared with those obtained by other approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:448 / 463
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Piecewise convexity of artificial neural networks
    Rister, Blaine
    Rubin, Daniel L.
    NEURAL NETWORKS, 2017, 94 : 34 - 45
  • [32] Statistical Methods and Artificial Neural Networks
    Mammadov, Mammadagha
    Yazici, Berna
    Yolacan, Senay
    Aslanargun, Atilla
    Yuzer, Ali Fuat
    Agaoglu, Embiya
    JOURNAL OF MODERN APPLIED STATISTICAL METHODS, 2006, 5 (02) : 495 - 512
  • [33] Are artificial neural networks white boxes?
    Kolman, E
    Margaliot, M
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, 2005, 16 (04): : 844 - 852
  • [34] Symbolic analysis of bursting dynamical regimes of Rulkov neural networks
    Budzinski, R. C.
    Lopes, S. R.
    Masoller, C.
    NEUROCOMPUTING, 2021, 441 : 44 - 51
  • [35] ARTIFICIAL METAPLASTICITY CAN IMPROVE ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS LEARNING
    Andina, Diego
    Alvarez-Vellisco, Antonio
    Jevtic, Aleksandar
    Fombellida, Juan
    INTELLIGENT AUTOMATION AND SOFT COMPUTING, 2009, 15 (04) : 683 - 696
  • [36] Data mining in a vibration analysis domain by extracting symbolic rules from RBF neural networks
    McGarry, K
    Maclntyre, J
    CONDITION MONITORING AND DIAGNOSTIC ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2001, : 553 - 560
  • [37] Predicting Credit Card Customer Loyalty Using Artificial Neural Networks
    Zhang, Tao
    Yuan, Bo
    Liu, Wenhuang
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH JOINT CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2008,
  • [38] PRUNING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS USING NEURAL COMPLEXITY MEASURES
    Jorgensen, Thomas D.
    Haynes, Barry P.
    Norlund, Charlotte C. F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEURAL SYSTEMS, 2008, 18 (05) : 389 - 403
  • [39] Training Artificial Neural Networks Using a Global Optimization Method That Utilizes Neural Networks
    Tsoulos, Ioannis G.
    Tzallas, Alexandros
    AI, 2023, 4 (03) : 491 - 508
  • [40] ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS VERSUS NATURAL NEURAL NETWORKS - A CONNECTIONIST PARADIGM FOR PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT
    WANG, J
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 1994, 11 (05) : 415 - 429