Neural correlates of turn-taking in the wild: Response planning starts early in free interviews

被引:23
作者
Bogels, Sara [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, POB 9104, NL-6500 HE Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Max Planck Inst Psycholinguist, Nijmegen, Netherlands
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Conversation; Turn-taking; Pragmatics; Language production; EEG; LANGUAGE PRODUCTION; COMPREHENSION; BRAIN; CONVERSATION; UTTERANCES; PREDICTION; SIGNATURES; SAY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104347
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Conversation is generally characterized by smooth transitions between turns, with only very short gaps. This entails that responders often begin planning their response before the ongoing turn is finished. However, controversy exists about whether they start planning as early as they can, to make sure they respond on time, or as late as possible, to minimize the overlap between comprehension and production planning. Two earlier EEG studies have found neural correlates of response planning (positive ERP and alpha decrease) as soon as listeners could start planning their response, already midway through the current turn. However, in these studies, the questions asked were highly controlled with respect to the position where planning could start (e.g., very early) and required short and easy responses. The present study measured participants' EEG while an experimenter interviewed them in a spontaneous interaction. Coding the questions in the interviews showed that, under these natural circumstances, listeners can, in principle, start planning a response relatively early, on average after only about one third of the question has passed. Furthermore, ERP results showed a large positivity, interpreted before as an early neural signature of response planning, starting about half a second after the start of the word that allowed listeners to start planning a response. A second neural signature of response planning, an alpha decrease, was not replicated as reliably. In conclusion, listeners appear to start planning their response early during the ongoing turn, also under natural circumstances, presumably in order to keep the gap between turns short and respond on time. These results have several important implications for turn-taking theories, which need to explain how interlocutors deal with the overlap between comprehension and production, how they manage to come in on time, and the sources that lead to variability between conversationalists in the start of planning.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items
    Baayen, R. H.
    Davidson, D. J.
    Bates, D. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 59 (04) : 390 - 412
  • [2] Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal
    Barr, Dale J.
    Levy, Roger
    Scheepers, Christoph
    Tily, Harry J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2013, 68 (03) : 255 - 278
  • [3] Speech Planning at Turn Transitions in Dialog Is Associated With Increased Processing Load
    Barthel, Mathias
    Sauppe, Sebastian
    [J]. COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2019, 43 (07)
  • [4] The Timing of Utterance Planning in Task-Oriented Dialogue: Evidence from a Novel List-Completion Paradigm
    Barthel, Mathias
    Sauppe, Sebastian
    Levinson, Stephen C.
    Meyer, Antje S.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 7
  • [5] Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
    Bates, Douglas
    Maechler, Martin
    Bolker, Benjamin M.
    Walker, Steven C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01): : 1 - 48
  • [6] Boersma P., 2012, PRAAT: doing phonetics by computer
  • [7] Bogels S., 2020, LANGUAGE ARCH MPI NI
  • [8] Conversational expectations get revised as response latencies unfold
    Bogels, Sara
    Kendrick, Kobin H.
    Levinson, Stephen C.
    [J]. LANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, : 766 - 779
  • [9] Planning versus comprehension in turn-taking: Fast responders show reduced anticipatory processing of the question
    Bogels, Sara
    Casillas, Marisa
    Levinson, Stephen C.
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2018, 109 : 295 - 310
  • [10] The Brain Behind the Response: Insights Into Turn-taking in Conversation From Neuroimaging
    Bogels, Sara
    Levinson, Stephen C.
    [J]. RESEARCH ON LANGUAGE AND SOCIAL INTERACTION, 2017, 50 (01) : 71 - 89