Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of Nd:YAG Laser and a Desensitizer Agent on the Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Clinical Study

被引:46
作者
Lopes, Anely Oliveira [1 ]
Correa Aranha, Ana Cecilia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Restorat Dent, Special Lab Lasers LELO, Sch Dent, BR-05508900 Sao Paulo, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
ALUMINUM-GARNET LASER; ND-YAG; ER-YAG; IRRADIATION; TUBULES; PERMEABILITY; ER; CR/YSGG; NEODYMIUM; EROSION; WEAR;
D O I
10.1089/pho.2012.3386
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The aim of this randomized longitudinal clinical study was to assess different treatment protocols for dentin hypersensitivity with high-power laser, desensitizing agent, and its association between high-power laser and desensitizing agent, for a period of 6 months. Background data: The literature shows a lack of treatment for dentin hypersensitivity, and lasers are contemporary alternatives. Methods: After inclusion and exclusion analysis, volunteers were selected. The lesions were divided into three groups (n = 10): G1, Gluma Desensitizer (Heraeus Kulzer); G2, Nd:YAG Laser (Power Laser (TM) ST6, Lares Research (R)) contact mode, laser protocol of 1.5 W, 10 Hz, and 100 mJ, approximate to 85 J/cm(2), four irradiations performed, each for 15 sec, in mesiodistal and occluso-apical directions, totaling 60 sec of irradiation with intervals of 10 sec between them; G3, Nd:YAG Laser + Gluma Desensitizer. The level of sensitivity to pain of each volunteer was analyzed by visual analog scale (VAS) using cold air stimuli and exploratory probe 5 min, 1 week, and 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. Data were collected and subjected to statistical analysis that detected statistically significant differences between the various studied time intervals of treatments (p > 0.05). Results: For the air stimulus, no significant differences were found for each time interval. For the long-term evaluation, all groups showed statistical differences (p > 0.05), indicating that for G2 and G3, this difference was statistically significant from the first time of evaluation (post 1), whereas in G1, the difference was significant from the post 2 evaluation (1 week). Comparison among groups using the probe stimulation showed significant differences in pain (p < 0.001). Only in G1 and G3 did this difference become significant from post 01. Conclusions: All protocols were effective in reducing dentinal hypersensitivity after 6 months of treatment; however, the association of Nd: YAG and Gluma Desensitizer is an effective treatment strategy that has immediate and long-lasting effects.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 138
页数:7
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, J CLIN LASER MED SUR, DOI DOI 10.1089/CLM.1995.13.329
[2]  
Aranha ACC, 2005, PHOTOMED LASER SURG, V23, P504
[3]  
Aranha Ana Cecilia Corrêa, 2009, Braz. oral res., V23, P333
[4]   A critical review of non-carious cervical (wear) lesions and the role of abfraction, erosion, and abrasion [J].
Bartlett, DW ;
Shah, P .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2006, 85 (04) :306-312
[5]  
Bartlett DW, 2005, INT DENT J, V55, P277
[6]   Comparative evaluation of the effects of Nd:YAG and Er:YAG laser in dentin hypersensitivity treatment [J].
Birang, Reza ;
Poursamimi, Jamshid ;
Gutknecht, Norbert ;
Lampert, Friedrich ;
Mir, Maziar .
LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 22 (01) :21-24
[7]   SENSITIVITY OF DENTINE [J].
BRANNSTROM, M .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 1966, 21 (04) :517-+
[8]  
BRANNSTROM M, 1972, INT DENT J, V22, P219
[9]  
Canadian Advisory Board on Dentin Hypersensitivity, 2003, J Can Dent Assoc, V69, P221
[10]   Treatment of cervical dentin hypersensitivity using neodymium: Yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser. Clinical evaluation [J].
Ciaramicoli, MT ;
Carvalho, RCR ;
Eduardo, CP .
LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE, 2003, 33 (05) :358-362