Three-dimensional analysis of bitemarks: A validation study using an intraoral scanner

被引:8
作者
Fournier, G. [1 ]
Savall, F. [2 ,3 ]
Galibourg, A. [1 ]
Gely, L. [1 ]
Telmon, N. [2 ,3 ]
Maret, D. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paul Sabatier, Ctr Hosp Univ, Fac Chirurg Dent, Toulouse, France
[2] Hop Rangueil, Serv Med Legale, Toulouse, France
[3] Univ Paul Sabatier, Lab Anthropol Mol & Imagerie Synth, Toulouse, France
关键词
Bitemarks; 3D analysis; Intraoral scanner; Mesh comparison software; Validation study; Predictive value; ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT; BITE; UNIQUENESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110198
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
Conservation of the three-dimensional aspect of bitemarks optimizes their analysis. Although bitemarks could be recorded with a surface scanner, in clinical dentistry, intraoral scanners are used as an alternative to conventional dental impressions. Here we assess the reproducibility and the reliability of a three-dimensional bitemark analysis protocol using an intraoral scanner. Twenty-seven volunteers bit on different materials: dental wax, hard cheese, chocolate and apple. Then, bitemarks and dentitions were scanned with the PlanMeca (R) Emerald intraoral scanner and the scans obtained were exported into the mesh comparison software, CloudCompare (R), which can generate overlays automatically. For this purpose, dentitions were aligned and compared with the indentations. The meshing and non -meshing areas were visualized using a colorimetric scale. First, the same blinded observer compared the bitten materials by analyzing 256 meshing areas for each. Secondly, comparisons of bitemarks from wax were analyzed in a randomized blinded study involving four observers (dentist, dental student, forensic scientist and police of ficer) and predictive values were calculated. The wax support obtained the best result and apple the worst. The rate of correct classi fications was high and misclassi fication was rare. For the all observers, negative predictive values were near 100%. Positive predictive values were more variable. Moreover, the work clearly highlighted the importance of experience in odontology. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2018, ID BIT GUID
  • [2] Besl PJ, 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intel, V14, P239, DOI [DOI 10.1109/34.121791, 10.1109/34.121791]
  • [3] 3-D imaging and quantitative comparison of human dentitions and simulated bite marks
    Blackwell, S. A.
    Taylor, R. V.
    Gordon, I.
    Ogleby, C. L.
    Tanijiri, T.
    Yoshino, M.
    Donald, M. R.
    Clement, J. G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE, 2007, 121 (01) : 9 - 17
  • [4] Bowers C.M., 2010, Forensic Dental Evidence: An Investigators Handbook
  • [5] Chong G., 2017, J FORENSIC IDENTIF, V67, P381
  • [6] Tri-dimensional pattern analysis of foodstuff bitemarks - A pilot study of tomographic database
    Corte-Real, Ana
    Pedrosa, Diana
    Saraiva, Jose
    Caetano, Catarina
    Vieira, Duarte Nuno
    [J]. FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 288 : 304 - 309
  • [7] Daniel M Jonathan, 2015, J Forensic Dent Sci, V7, P222, DOI 10.4103/0975-1475.172442
  • [8] A comparative study to investigate the effect of orthodontic treatment on the uniqueness of the human anterior dentition
    Dyke, Alice Elizabeth Catherine
    Cunningham, Susan
    Hunt, Nigel
    Ruff, Clifford
    [J]. FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 289 : 368 - 373
  • [9] The uniqueness of the human dentition as forensic evidence: a systematic review on the technological methodology
    Franco, Ademir
    Willems, Guy
    Couto Souza, Paulo Henrique
    Bekkering, Geertruida E.
    Thevissen, Patrick
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE, 2015, 129 (06) : 1277 - 1283
  • [10] A perspective on bitemark analysis: From empiricism to scientific rationality
    Georget C.
    Conigliaro A.
    [J]. IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Magazine, 2017, 20 (01) : 11 - 14