Nifedipine versus terbutaline for tocolysis in external cephalic version

被引:20
|
作者
Ismail, Nor Azlin Mohamed [1 ]
Ibrahim, Maryasalwati [1 ]
Naim, Norzilawati Mohd [1 ]
Mahdy, Zaleha Abdullah [1 ]
Jamil, Mohammad Abdul [1 ]
Razi, Zainul Rashid Mohd [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
关键词
breech; external cephalic version (ECV); nifedipine; tocolysis; terbutaline;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.04.010
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To study the efficacy of nifedipine compared with terbutaline as a tocolytic agent in external cephalic version (ECV). Methods: A prospective, randomized, comparative trial was carried out in a tertiary hospital. Women with singleton term breech pregnancies were randomized for nifedipine (group A) and terbutaline (group B) tocolysis for ECV in an outpatient setting. The efficacy, side effects, and complications were analyzed and compared. Results: A total of 86 women were recruited with 43 women in each group. The overall success rate was 48.8% and this reduced the rate of cesarean delivery for breech presentation by 32.5% in our center. ECV was successful in 39.5% of women in group A and 58.1% in group B. Fewer side effects were experienced by the women in group A compared with group B, although this was not significant. Conclusion: Nifedipine can be used as an alternative for tocolysis in ECV when there are maternal contraindications to beta-sympathomimetics. (c) 2008 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 266
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The use of atosiban and ritodrine in external cephalic version
    Stergiotou, Iosifina
    Talbot, Fleur
    Yoong, Wai
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2007, 86 (08) : 927 - 929
  • [42] External cephalic version for breech presentation at term
    Hofmeyr, G. Justus
    Kulier, Regina
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (10):
  • [43] External cephalic version-Chances and risks
    Bossung, Verena
    Andermatt, Michelle
    GYNAKOLOGIE, 2024, 57 (04): : 212 - 219
  • [44] External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
    Sanchez-Romero, Javier
    Garcia-Soria, Vanesa
    Araico-Rodriguez, Fernando
    Herrera-Gimenez, Javier
    Blanco-Carnero, Jose E.
    Nieto-Diaz, Anibal
    Luisa Sanchez-Ferrer, Maria
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2020, (160): : 1 - 7
  • [45] Is external cephalic version for breech presentation useful?
    Helmlinger, C.
    Langer, B.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2008, 36 (04): : 472 - 474
  • [46] Management of labor after external cephalic version
    Levin, Gabriel
    Rottenstreich, Amihai
    Meyer, Raanan
    Weill, Yishay
    Pollack, Raphael N.
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (01) : 30 - 35
  • [47] Late preterm versus term external cephalic version: an audit of a single obstetrician experience
    Levin, Gabriel
    Rottenstreich, Amihai
    Weill, Yishay
    Pollack, Raphael N.
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2019, 300 (04) : 875 - 880
  • [48] Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Myometrial Thickness and Prediction of a Successful External Cephalic Version
    Buhimschi, Catalin S.
    Buhimschi, Irina A.
    Wehrum, Mark J.
    Molaskey-Jones, Sherry
    Sfakianaki, Anna K.
    Pettker, Christian M.
    Thung, Stephen
    Campbell, Katherine H.
    Dulay, Antonette T.
    Funai, Edmund F.
    Bahtiyar, Mert O.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (04) : 913 - 920
  • [49] EFFECT OF TERBUTALINE TOCOLYSIS ON INFANT BIRTH-WEIGHT
    ROBINS, GW
    BLOUNT, BW
    ARLINE, A
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 1995, 40 (06) : 581 - 585
  • [50] Neuraxial blockade for external cephalic version: Cost analysis
    Yamasato, Kelly
    Kaneshiro, Bliss
    Salcedo, Jennifer
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2015, 41 (07) : 1023 - 1031