Likelihood-based confidence intervals for the risk difference of two-sample binary data with a fallible classifier and a gold standard

被引:2
作者
Rahardja, Dewi [1 ]
Zhao, Yan D.
机构
[1] UT SW Med Ctr, Dept Clin Sci, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
Binary data; Confidence interval; Misclassification; Risk difference; Validation substudy; DOUBLE SAMPLING SCHEME; ODDS RATIOS; MISCLASSIFICATION; PROPORTIONS; EXPOSURE; ERRORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.stamet.2010.09.005
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
We develop likelihood-based confidence intervals for risk difference in two-sample misclassified binary data. Such data consist of two studies. The first study is the main study where individuals are classified by an inexpensive fallible classifier which may misclassify. The second study is a validation substudy where individuals are classified by using both the fallible classifier and an expensive gold standard which classifies perfectly. We propose and examine three likelihood-based confidence interval methods and conclude that the modified Wald method applied to small-number adjusted new data performs well and has nominal coverage probabilities. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 212
页数:9
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Approximate is better than "exact" for interval estimation of binomial proportions [J].
Agresti, A ;
Coull, BA .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1998, 52 (02) :119-126
[2]   MISCLASSIFICATION IN 2 X 2 TABLES [J].
BROSS, I .
BIOMETRICS, 1954, 10 (04) :478-486
[3]   CASE-CONTROL STUDIES WITH ERRORS IN COVARIATES [J].
CARROLL, RJ ;
GAIL, MH ;
LUBIN, JH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 88 (421) :185-199
[4]   EFFECTS OF MISCLASSIFICATION ON BIAS IN DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 2 PROPORTIONS AND RELATIVE ODDS IN FOURFOLD TABLE [J].
GOLDBERG, JD .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1975, 70 (351) :561-567
[5]   VARIANCE-ESTIMATION FOR EPIDEMIOLOGIC EFFECT ESTIMATES UNDER MISCLASSIFICATION [J].
GREENLAND, S .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1988, 7 (07) :745-757
[6]   USE OF DOUBLE SAMPLING SCHEMES IN ANALYZING CATEGORICAL DATA WITH MISCLASSIFICATION ERRORS [J].
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1977, 72 (360) :914-921
[7]   A Bayesian approach to obtain confidence intervals for binomial proportion in a double sampling scheme subject to false-positive misclassification [J].
Lee, Seung-Chun ;
Byun, Jong-Seok .
JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN STATISTICAL SOCIETY, 2008, 37 (04) :393-403
[8]   A note on estimating crude odds ratios in case-control studies with differentially misclassified exposure [J].
Lyles, RH .
BIOMETRICS, 2002, 58 (04) :1034-1036
[9]   VALIDATION-STUDY METHODS FOR ESTIMATING EXPOSURE PROPORTIONS AND ODDS RATIOS WITH MISCLASSIFIED DATA [J].
MARSHALL, RJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 43 (09) :941-947
[10]   A simple Bayesian analysis of misclassified binary data with a validation substudy [J].
Prescott, GJ ;
Garthwaite, PH .
BIOMETRICS, 2002, 58 (02) :454-458