Preclinical Comparison of H-scan Ultrasound and Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Monitoring Treatment Response in Breast Cancer

被引:0
作者
Tai, Haowei [1 ]
Margolis, Ryan [2 ]
Li, Junjie [2 ]
Hoyt, Kenneth [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Dallas, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Richardson, TX 75083 USA
[2] Univ Texas Dallas, Dept Bioengn, Richardson, TX USA
来源
2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ULTRASONICS SYMPOSIUM (IEEE IUS) | 2022年
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
acoustic scattering; breast cancer; H-scan; MRI; tissue characterization; ultrasound imaging;
D O I
10.1109/IUS54386.2022.9958626
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
The use of ultrasound (US) for tumor tissue characterization remains an exciting prospect. The purpose of this research project was to introduce a 3-dimensional (3-D) H-scan US imaging system to monitor response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Studies were conducted using female mice (N= 20) implanted with 1 million breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231). Once tumors were formed, animals were treated with a sham drug or low or high doses of cisplatin. In vivo US imaging was performed using Vevo 3100 system (FUJIFILM VisualSonics Inc) equipped with an MX201 transducer and motorized positioner. To generate the H-scan US images, Gaussian-weighted Hermite polynomial filters were convolved with the radiofrequency (RF) data to measure the relative strength of the backscattered US signals Animals also underwent diffusionweighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) using a preclinical scanner (BioSpec 3T, Bruker Corp) for generation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps as a measure of intratumoral water diffusion. In vivo results demonstrated that 3D H-scan US imaging was more sensitive to tumor changes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy as compared to B-scan US. While there was no difference at baseline (p > 0.60), H-scan US images from the cisplatin treated tumors exhibited increased intensity at 7 d (36.4 +/- 6.9% and 43.8 +/- 8.1% for low and high dosed groups, respectively) indicating a decrease in aggregate US scatterer size. Collectively, these observations were confirmed by histological analysis. Overall, 3-D H-scan US imaging is a promising new tool for monitoring cancer response to neoadjuvant therapy. In vivo results matched those found using DW-MRI, which is an established modality for assessing anticancer treatment using apoptosis-inducing drugs.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Khaing M. S., 2020, 2020 IEEE C COMP APP, P1, DOI [10.1109/ICCA49400.2020.9022832, DOI 10.1109/ICCA49400.2020.9022832]
[2]  
Khairalseed M, 2021, PROC UFFC LATIN AM U, P1
[3]  
Khairalseed M, 2020, I S BIOMED IMAGING, P1820, DOI [10.1109/ISBI45749.2020.9098439, 10.1109/isbi45749.2020.9098439]
[4]   Real-time H-scan ultrasound imaging using a Verasonics research scanner [J].
Khairalseed, Mawia ;
Brown, Katherine ;
Parker, Kevin J. ;
Hoyt, Kenneth .
ULTRASONICS, 2019, 94 :28-36
[5]   Monitoring Early Breast Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy Using H-Scan Ultrasound Imaging: Preliminary Preclinical Results [J].
Khairalseed, Mawia ;
Javed, Kulsoom ;
Jashkaran, Gadhvi ;
Kim, Jung-Whan ;
Parker, Kevin J. ;
Hoyt, Kenneth .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2019, 38 (05) :1259-1268
[6]   SPATIAL ANGULAR COMPOUNDING TECHNIQUE FOR H-SCAN ULTRASOUND IMAGING [J].
Khairalseed, Mawia ;
Xiong, Fangyuan ;
Kim, Jung-Whan ;
Mattrey, Robert F. ;
Parker, Kevin J. ;
Hoyt, Kenneth .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 44 (01) :267-277
[7]   H-scan sensitivity to scattering size [J].
Khairalseed M. ;
Hoyt K. ;
Ormachea J. ;
Terrazas A. ;
Parker K.J. .
Journal of Medical Imaging, 2017, 4 (04)
[8]   Mechanics of the Nucleus [J].
Lammerding, Jan .
COMPREHENSIVE PHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 1 (02) :783-807
[9]   Review of Quantitative Ultrasound: Envelope Statistics and Backscatter Coefficient Imaging and Contributions to Diagnostic Ultrasound [J].
Oelze, Michael L. ;
Mamou, Jonathan .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS FERROELECTRICS AND FREQUENCY CONTROL, 2016, 63 (02) :336-351
[10]   Scattering and reflection identification in H-scan images [J].
Parker, K. J. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2016, 61 (12) :L20-L28