Physiological and morphological effects of glyphosate applications on glyphosate-resistant cotton

被引:0
|
作者
Pline, WA [1 ]
Edmisten, KL [1 ]
Wilcut, JW [1 ]
Wells, R [1 ]
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Crop Sci, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Decreased boll retention and pollination problems in glyphosate-resistant (GR) cotton treated with glyphosate have been reported by growers in the Southeastern USA. Greenhouse and field studies support these reports, demonstrating a glyphosate-induced decrease in boll retention, seeds per boll, and pollen viability. C-14-glyphosate absorption and translocation studies showed that glyphosate accumulated in reproductive tissues as well as other sink tissues such as roots. Reproductive square tissue (floral bud) of both GR and conventional cotton was more sensitive to glyphosate than leaf tissue, as measured by accumulation of shikimic acid per muM translocated glyphosate. In phytotron experiments, 45 to 55% of pollen grains from glyphosate-treated GR cotton were deformed when stained with fluorescein diacetate. Anther filaments of glyphosate-treated GR cotton flowers failed to elongate normally, resulting in a greater distance between the receptive stigma tip and the pollen containing anthers. GR cotton reproductive sensitivity to glyphosate resulting in decreased pollen viability, and poor pollen deposition may explain grower observed boll retention and pollination problems.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 344
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Glyphosate effects on symbiotic nitrogen fixation in glyphosate-resistant soybean
    Fan, Lu
    Feng, Yucheng
    Weaver, David B.
    Delaney, Dennis P.
    Wehtje, Glenn R.
    Wang, Guoying
    APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 2017, 121 : 11 - 19
  • [22] Volunteer Glyphosate-Resistant Corn Interference and Control in Glyphosate-Resistant Sugarbeet
    Kniss, Andrew R.
    Sbatella, Gustavo M.
    Wilson, Robert G.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 26 (02) : 348 - 355
  • [23] Evolution of glyphosate-resistant Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in glyphosate-resistant soybean
    Vila-Aiub, Martin M.
    Balbi, Maria C.
    Gundel, Pedro E.
    Ghersa, Claudio M.
    Powles, Stephen B.
    WEED SCIENCE, 2007, 55 (06) : 566 - 571
  • [24] Control of Volunteer Glyphosate-Resistant Canola in Glyphosate-Resistant Sugar Beet
    Kumar, Vipan
    Jha, Prashant
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 29 (01) : 93 - 100
  • [25] Tolerance of a glyphosate-resistant soybean to late-season glyphosate applications
    Norsworthy, JK
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 18 (02) : 454 - 457
  • [26] Absorption and translocation of glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant cotton as influenced by application method and growth stage
    Pline, WA
    Price, AJ
    Wilcut, JW
    Edmisten, KL
    Wells, R
    WEED SCIENCE, 2001, 49 (04) : 460 - 467
  • [27] The rise and future of glyphosate and glyphosate-resistant crops
    Green, Jerry M.
    PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2018, 74 (05) : 1035 - 1039
  • [28] Comparison of glyphosate products in glyphosate-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and corn (Zea mays)
    Parker, RG
    York, AC
    Jordan, DL
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 19 (04) : 796 - 802
  • [29] Glyphosate-resistant soybean cultivar response to glyphosate
    Elmore, RW
    Roeth, FW
    Klein, RN
    Knezevic, SZ
    Martin, A
    Nelson, LA
    Shapiro, CA
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2001, 93 (02) : 404 - 407
  • [30] Sustainability and stewardship of glyphosate and glyphosate-resistant crops
    Sammons, R. Douglas
    Heering, David C.
    Dinicola, Natalie
    Glick, Harvey
    Elmore, Greg A.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 21 (02) : 347 - 354