Program of laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy with retroperitoneoscopic access - a Polish single-center experience - success or disappointment?

被引:0
作者
Slojewski, Marcin [1 ]
Myslak, Marek [2 ]
Domanski, Leszek [2 ]
Pabisiak, Krzysztof [2 ]
Jasiczek, Agata [2 ]
Sulikowski, Tadeusz [3 ]
Sienko, Jerzy [3 ]
Ciechanowski, Kazimierz [2 ]
Ostrowski, Marek [3 ]
Sikorski, Andrzej [1 ]
机构
[1] Pomeranian Med Univ, Dept Urol & Urol Oncol, PL-70111 Szczecin, Poland
[2] Pomeranian Med Univ, Dept Nephrol Transplantol & Internal Dis, PL-70111 Szczecin, Poland
[3] Pomeranian Med Univ, Dept Gen Surg & Transplantol, PL-70111 Szczecin, Poland
关键词
kidney transplantation; laparoscopic surgery; laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy; KIDNEY; TRANSPLANTATION; SURVIVAL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy (LLDN) is an attractive alternative to open approach and is a widely accepted method of kidney retrieval for transplantation. Here, we present the first Polish series of LLDN performed at a single center. Material/Methods: Between April 2008 and May 2012, we performed 8 LLDN with an immediate renal transplantation using classical surgical approach and technique. Four men and 4 women were operated on. In all cases of LLDN, left kidneys were retrieved and retroperitoneal approach with 3 trocars was used according to the technique we described previously. Results: No intra-or postoperative complications were observed. The average "skin-to-skin" time of surgery was 138 minutes (min. 80; max. 210). The blood loss ranged from 0 to 280 ml (average, 80). Warm ischemia time did not exceed 3 minutes in any case. All organs were immediately implanted in the second operating room. Postoperative course was uneventful in all donors and recipients. Conclusions: Similar to many authors, at the beginning of our program we hoped that introduction of LLDN would increase the donor pool in Poland. Unfortunately, so far, these expectations have not been realized. However, we consider our program as a success regarding multidisciplinary cooperation and feasibility of LLDN in our country.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy
    Alston, C
    Spaliviero, M
    Gill, IS
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2005, 65 (05) : 833 - 839
  • [2] Antoszkiewicz K, 2012, B INFORM, V1, P20
  • [3] Single-Port Donor Nephrectomy Provides Improved Patient Satisfaction and Equivalent Outcomes
    Barth, Rolf N.
    Phelan, Michael W.
    Goldschen, Lauren
    Munivenkatappa, Raghava B.
    Jacobs, Stephen C.
    Bartlett, Stephen T.
    Philosophe, Benjamin
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 257 (03) : 527 - 533
  • [4] Why potential live renal donors prefer laparoscopic nephrectomy: a survey of live donor attitudes
    Chung, Eric
    Grant, Alexander B. F.
    Hibberd, Adrian D.
    Sprott, Phillip
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 100 (06) : 1344 - 1346
  • [5] Ciszek M, 2012, ANN TRANSPL, V17, P103
  • [6] Czyzewski L, 2012, ANN TRANSPL, V17, P62
  • [7] Living Donor Nephrectomy - Quantifying the Risk for the Donor
    Giessing, M.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2012, 44 (06) : 1786 - 1789
  • [8] Fate of donor kidney: Laparoscopic versus open technique
    Goel, MC
    Modlin, CS
    Mottoo, AM
    Derweesh, IH
    Flechner, SM
    Streem, S
    Gill, I
    Goldfarb, DA
    Novick, AC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (06) : 2326 - 2330
  • [9] International Registry in Organ Donation and Transplantation 2010
    Gomez, M. P.
    Arredondo, E.
    Paez, G.
    Manyalich, M.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2012, 44 (06) : 1592 - 1597
  • [10] Laparoscopic Living-Donor Nephrectomy: Analysis of the Existing Literature
    Greco, Francesco
    Hoda, M. Raschid
    Alcaraz, Antonio
    Bachmann, Alexander
    Hakenberg, Oliver W.
    Fornara, Paolo
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 58 (04) : 498 - 509