Furious Activity vs. Understanding: How Much Expertise Is Needed to Evaluate Creative Work?

被引:110
作者
Kaufman, James C. [1 ]
Baer, John [2 ]
Cropley, David H. [3 ]
Reiter-Palmon, Roni [4 ]
Sinnett, Sarah [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Neag Sch Educ, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[2] Rider Univ, Dept Teacher Educ, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648 USA
[3] Univ S Australia, Sch Engn, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[4] Univ Nebraska, Dept Psychol, Omaha, NE 68182 USA
关键词
creativity; expertise; creative domains; assessment; CONSENSUAL ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUE; NONEXPERT RATERS; MODEL; CONSISTENCY; PSYCHOLOGY; APPRAISAL; GENDER; EYE;
D O I
10.1037/a0034809
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
What is the role of expertise in evaluating creative products? Novices and experts do not assess creativity similarly, indicating domain-specific knowledge's role in judging creativity. We describe two studies that examined how "quasi-experts" (people who have more experience in a domain than novices but also lack recognized standing as experts) compared with novices and experts in rating creative work. In Study 1, we compared different types of quasi-experts with novices and experts in rating short stories. In Study 2, we compared experts, quasi-experts, and novices in evaluating an engineering product (a mousetrap design). Quasi-experts (regardless of type) seemed to be appropriate raters for short stories, yet results were mixed for the engineer quasi-experts. Some domains may require more expertise than others to properly evaluate creative work.
引用
收藏
页码:332 / 340
页数:9
相关论文
共 60 条