Spread of Unethical Behavior in Organizations: A Dynamic Social Network Perspective

被引:31
作者
Zuber, Franziska [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam Sch Management, Dept Business Soc Management, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Unethical behavior; Misconduct; Contagion; Spread; Social network analysis; ABUSIVE SUPERVISION; FRIENDSHIP SELECTION; MORAL DISENGAGEMENT; WORKPLACE; MODEL; AGGRESSION; ATTRIBUTION; EMPLOYEES; JUSTICE; ROLES;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-014-2270-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The spread of unethical behavior in organizations has mainly been studied in terms of processes occurring in a general social context, rather than in terms of actors' reactions in the context of their specific social relationships. This paper introduces a dynamic social network analysis framework in which this spread is conceptualized as the result of the reactions of perpetrators, victims, and observers to an initial act of unethical behavior. This theoretical framework shows that the social relationships of the actors involved in an initial act impact in multiple ways the likelihood that unethical behavior spreads. It reveals furthermore that social relationships may change in the wake of unethical behavior, such that indirect negative consequences can arise for organizations. The proposed framework provides a basis for the development of a formal stochastic actor-oriented model of network dynamics which would enable simulations of the spread of unethical behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 172
页数:22
相关论文
共 132 条
[21]  
Bandura A., 1973, Aggression: A social learning analysis
[22]   Predicting Workplace Aggression and Violence [J].
Barling, Julian ;
Dupre, Kathryne E. ;
Kelloway, E. Kevin .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 60 :671-692
[23]   GUILT - AN INTERPERSONAL APPROACH [J].
BAUMEISTER, RF ;
STILLWELL, AM ;
HEATHERTON, TF .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1994, 115 (02) :243-267
[24]  
Bazerman MaxH., 2011, BLIND SPOTS WHY WE F, V1st
[25]  
Bies R.J., 1997, ANTISOCIAL BEHAV ORG, P18
[26]  
Bies R.J., 2005, Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets, P65, DOI [10.1037/10893-003, DOI 10.1037/10893-003]
[27]   WHAT TRIGGERS CAUSAL ATTRIBUTIONS - THE IMPACT OF VALENCE AND SUBJECTIVE-PROBABILITY [J].
BOHNER, G ;
BLESS, H ;
SCHWARZ, N ;
STRACK, F .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 18 (04) :335-345
[28]  
Bond Matthew, 2011, The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis, P196
[29]  
Borgatti S.P., 2011, The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis, P417, DOI 10.4135/9781446294413.n28
[30]   Workplace harassment from the victim's perspective: A theoretical model and meta-analysis [J].
Bowling, Nathan A. ;
Beehr, Terry A. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 91 (05) :998-1012