Spread of Unethical Behavior in Organizations: A Dynamic Social Network Perspective

被引:31
作者
Zuber, Franziska [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam Sch Management, Dept Business Soc Management, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Unethical behavior; Misconduct; Contagion; Spread; Social network analysis; ABUSIVE SUPERVISION; FRIENDSHIP SELECTION; MORAL DISENGAGEMENT; WORKPLACE; MODEL; AGGRESSION; ATTRIBUTION; EMPLOYEES; JUSTICE; ROLES;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-014-2270-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The spread of unethical behavior in organizations has mainly been studied in terms of processes occurring in a general social context, rather than in terms of actors' reactions in the context of their specific social relationships. This paper introduces a dynamic social network analysis framework in which this spread is conceptualized as the result of the reactions of perpetrators, victims, and observers to an initial act of unethical behavior. This theoretical framework shows that the social relationships of the actors involved in an initial act impact in multiple ways the likelihood that unethical behavior spreads. It reveals furthermore that social relationships may change in the wake of unethical behavior, such that indirect negative consequences can arise for organizations. The proposed framework provides a basis for the development of a formal stochastic actor-oriented model of network dynamics which would enable simulations of the spread of unethical behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 172
页数:22
相关论文
共 132 条
[11]   Overt anger in response to victimization: Attributional style and organizational norms as moderators [J].
Aquino, K ;
Douglas, S ;
Martinko, MJ .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 9 (02) :152-164
[12]   How employees respond to personal offense: The effects of blame attribution, victim status, and offender status on revenge and reconciliation in the workplace [J].
Aquino, K ;
Tripp, TM ;
Bies, RJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 86 (01) :52-59
[13]   The effects of negative affectivity, hierarchical status, and self-determination on workplace victimization [J].
Aquino, K ;
Grover, SL ;
Bradfield, M ;
Allen, DG .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 42 (03) :260-272
[14]   Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations [J].
Aquino, Karl ;
Tripp, Thomas M. ;
Bies, Robert J. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 91 (03) :653-668
[15]   SOCIAL IDENTITY THEORY AND THE ORGANIZATION [J].
ASHFORTH, BE ;
MAEL, F .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1989, 14 (01) :20-39
[16]   The normalization of corruption in organizations [J].
Ashforth, BE ;
Anand, V .
RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL 25, 2003, 25 :1-52
[17]  
Ashforth BE, 2008, ACAD MANAGE REV, V33, P670
[18]  
Banaji MR, 2003, HARVARD BUS REV, V81, P56
[19]  
Bandura A, 1996, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V71, P364, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364
[20]  
Bandura A, 1999, Pers Soc Psychol Rev, V3, P193, DOI 10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3