Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) as a competitive parameter within sustainable buildings and building materials

被引:27
作者
Andersen, S. C. [1 ,2 ]
Larsen, H. F. [1 ,2 ]
Raffnsoe, L. [3 ]
Melvang, C. [4 ]
机构
[1] EPD Danmark, DK-2630 Taastrup, Denmark
[2] Danish Technol Inst, Bldg & Environm, DK-2630 Taastrup, Denmark
[3] Green Bldg Council Denmark, Frederiksborggade 22, DK-1360 Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] MiljoForum Fyn Byggeri, Forskerpk 10, DK-5230 Odense, Denmark
来源
SUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT D-A-CH CONFERENCE 2019 (SBE19 GRAZ) | 2019年 / 323卷
关键词
D O I
10.1088/1755-1315/323/1/012145
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The demand for technical and verified documentation of buildings and building materials is growing, along with the increasing focus on sustainability in the built environment. However, despite a common wish to build sustainably, it is still found that EPDs and LCAs are not always similarly interpreted, leading to misunderstandings on how they should be used to quantify and verify sustainability along with being a competitive parameter when choosing materials. To overcome this barrier this project seeks to discover: 1. How can EPDs be used as a competitive parameter within the sustainable built environment? 2. How can product specific EPDs, used as an input to building-level LCAs, help to quantify the concept of 'circular economy'? 3. How do some countries seem to succeed in introducing EPDs to industry while others only succeed to a lesser extent? By involving the Danish building-industry's value-chain through qualitative interviews, workshops and reference groups, as well as by contacting EPD programme operators throughout Europe and USA, a mapping has been performed on the tendencies of how and to what extend EPDs are used to quantify and support material decision-making in buildings. Further, the drivers as to why EPDs are used in some countries is investigated along with suggestions on how to boost the development, use and integration of EPDs with the aim of quantifying and documenting sustainability in the built environment.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Anderson J, 2018, EPD NUMBERS CONTINUE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, EU GPP CRIT OFF BUIL
[3]  
BREEAM Norway, 2016, TECHNICAL MANUAL SD5
[4]  
Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM), 2018, BREEAM NEW CONSTR
[5]  
Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM), 2016, TECHN 7AN SD233 2 0
[6]   Measuring embodied carbon dioxide equivalent of buildings: A review and critique of current industry practice [J].
De Wolf, Catherine ;
Pomponi, Francesco ;
Moncaster, Alice .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2017, 140 :68-80
[7]  
Ganassali S., 2018, Designing Sustainable Technologies, Products and Policies, P503, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-66981-6_5, 10.1007/978-3-319-66981-6_56, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-66981-6_56]
[8]  
German Green Building Council, 2018, GRUNDSTR DGNB SYST D
[9]  
Green Building Council Denmark, 2016, DGNB MAN ET RAEKK
[10]   Environmental Product Declarations: exploring their evolution and the factors affecting their demand in Europe [J].
Ibanez-Fores, V. ;
Pacheco-Blanco, B. ;
Capuz-Rizo, S. F. ;
Bovea, M. D. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 116 :157-169