A small-scale transdisciplinary process to maximising the energy efficiency of food factories: insights and recommendations from the development of a novel heat integration framework

被引:25
作者
Miah, J. H. [1 ,2 ]
Griffiths, A. [1 ]
McNeill, R. [3 ]
Poonaji, I. [4 ]
Martin, R. [5 ]
Morse, S. [2 ]
Yang, A. [6 ]
Sadhukhan, J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Nestle UK Ltd, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE3 3TR, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Univ Surrey, Fac Engn & Phys Sci, Ctr Environm Strategy, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, England
[3] Nestle UK Ltd, Grp Engn, York YO91 1XY, N Yorkshire, England
[4] Nestle UK Ltd, Grp Tech, Gatwick RH6 0PA, England
[5] Nestle UK Ltd, Tech & Prod, York YO91 1XY, N Yorkshire, England
[6] Univ Surrey, Fac Engn & Phys Sci, Dept Chem & Proc Engn, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Transdisciplinary; Energy efficiency; Heat integration; Pinch analysis; Food factory; Sustainable manufacturing; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1007/s11625-015-0331-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The rise and uncertainty in energy prices in recent years has widened the solution search space by industry to understand the full impacts on operations and to develop a range of workable solutions to reduce risk. This has involved companies exploring alternative approaches to co-create solutions with different groups comprising varying intellectual capital, e.g. consultants, NGOs, and academia. This paper presents the small-scale transdisciplinary process adopted by Nestl, UK in partnership with the University of Surrey as part of an Engineering Doctorate (EngD) programme to co-develop a heat integration framework to improve the energy efficiency of a confectionery factory. The small-scale co-creation process-between industry and academia-for a heat integration framework is described and includes a set of criteria to evaluate the effectiveness of the process. The results of the evaluation process and a reflection of the key challenges and implications faced when trying to implement a small-scale transdisciplinary process are reported which covers the role of an EngD researcher as a manager, facilitator and researcher, time management, finance, communication, knowledge integration, mutual learning, and conflict. Some of the key recommendations for industrial practitioners include: actively engaging in the transdisciplinary process on a consistent basis, staying open minded to developing a solution even when there is a lack of progress, and building relationships with academics by supporting university activities, e.g. lecturing, research projects and funding proposals. For scientists, PhD students, research institutes, and private and public R&D, some of the key recommendations include: communicating expert knowledge to a few points rather than opening out into a lecture, contributing to the transdisciplinary process even if it is on a non-expert level but provides objective and critical input, and visiting industrial sites to gain exposure to industrial problems first-hand. Overall, the range of recommendations provided can help both industrial practitioners and scientists, especially doctoral students seeking to operate in the industry-academia domain on a small-practically manageable-scale.
引用
收藏
页码:621 / 637
页数:17
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Transdisciplinary co-production of knowledge in the development of organic agriculture in Switzerland
    Aeberhard, Andrea
    Rist, Stephan
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (04) : 1171 - 1181
  • [2] [Anonymous], DES SUST STEP BY STE
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, ISO14040 - Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework, DOI DOI 10.3403/30151316.
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2006, FOOD IND SUST STRAT
  • [5] [Anonymous], VIS 2020 ASS FUT MAN
  • [6] [Anonymous], SUST MAN EC INN FRAM
  • [7] [Anonymous], FOOD STAT POCK 2013
  • [8] [Anonymous], INT SCI TECHN
  • [9] Bergmann M., 2005, Quality Criteria of Transdisciplinary Research. A Guide for the Formative Evaluation of Research Projects
  • [10] Balancing divergence and convergence in transdisciplinary research teams
    Boon, Wouter P. C.
    Chappin, Maryse M. H.
    Perenboom, Jaap
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2014, 40 : 57 - 68