Academic Vocabulary Learning in First Through Third Grade in Low-Income Schools: Effects of Automated Supplemental Instruction

被引:15
作者
Goldstein, Howard [1 ]
Ziolkowski, Robyn A. [2 ]
Bojczyk, Kathryn E. [3 ]
Marty, Ana [4 ]
Schneider, Naomi [5 ]
Harpring, Jayme [5 ]
Haring, Christa D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[2] Univ Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO USA
[3] Catholic Univ Amer, Washington, DC 20064 USA
[4] Florida State Univ, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[5] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH | 2017年 / 60卷 / 11期
关键词
KINDERGARTEN STUDENTS; PRESCHOOL-CHILDREN; LANGUAGE; INTERVENTION; ACQUISITION; WORDS; COMPREHENSION; KNOWLEDGE; STORYBOOKS; MEANINGS;
D O I
10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-17-0100
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study investigated cumulative effects of language learning, specifically whether prior vocabulary knowledge or special education status moderated the effects of academic vocabulary instruction in high-poverty schools. Method: Effects of a supplemental intervention targeting academic vocabulary in first through third grades were evaluated with 241 students (6-9 years old) from low-income families, 48% of whom were retained for the 3-year study duration. Students were randomly assigned to vocabulary instruction or comparison groups. Results: Curriculum-based measures of word recognition, receptive identification, expressive labeling, and decontextualized definitions showed large effects for multiple levels of word learning. Hierarchical linear modeling revealed that students with higher initial Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Fourth Edition scores (Dunn & Dunn, 2007) demonstrated greater word learning, whereas students with special needs demonstrated less growth in vocabulary. Conclusion: This model of vocabulary instruction can be applied efficiently in high-poverty schools through an automated, easily implemented adjunct to reading instruction in the early grades and holds promise for reducing gaps in vocabulary development.
引用
收藏
页码:3237 / 3258
页数:22
相关论文
共 94 条
  • [1] Anderson R.C., 1991, HDB READING RES, V2, P690
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2000, Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2008, DEV EARL LIT REP NAT
  • [4] Effects of a supplemental vocabulary program in third-grade reading/language arts
    Apthorp, Helen S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 100 (02) : 67 - 79
  • [5] Bailey A.L., 2008, FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT
  • [6] Baker S.K., 1998, WHAT READING RES TEL, P183
  • [7] Baumann J.F., 2004, Vocabulary instruction: Research to practice
  • [8] What Is Academic Vocabulary?
    Baumann, James F.
    Graves, Michael F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT & ADULT LITERACY, 2010, 54 (01) : 4 - 12
  • [9] Beck I., 1991, Handbook of reading research, V2, P789
  • [10] Beck I.L., 1987, The nature of vocabulary acquisition, P147