Combined wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis and aspheric ablation profile with iris registration to correct myopia

被引:13
|
作者
Wu, Junshu [3 ]
Zhong, Xingwu [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Bin
Wang, Zheng
Yu, Keming
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Zhongshan Ophthalm Ctr, Hainan Eye Hosp, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, State Key Lab Ophthalmol, Hainan Eye Hosp, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Zhongshan Ophthalm Ctr, State Key Lab Ophthalmol, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
CORNEAL REFRACTIVE SURGERY; HIGHER-ORDER ABERRATIONS; PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; SPHERICAL-ABERRATION; CONTRALATERAL EYE; LASIK; CYCLOTORSION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.01.043
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To compare the effects of a combined wavefront-guided and aspheric ablation profile with an aspheric ablation profile alone to correct myopia in patients with a preoperative total higher-order aberration root mean square (HOA RMS) lower than 0.30 mu m in both eyes. SETTING: Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. DESIGN: Comparative case series. METHODS: Laser in situ keratomileusis was performed, with 1 eye randomized to wavefront-guided with aspheric ablation and the fellow eye to aspheric ablation only. The uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, manifest subjective refraction, corneal topography, RMS value of total and grouped HOAs, and contrast sensitivity were measured preoperatively and 1 and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The study enrolled 62 eyes (31 patients). The increasing factors of total HOA RMS, 3rd-order RMS and 4th-order RMS were 2.09, 2.09, and 1.99, respectively, in the wavefront-guided with aspheric ablation group and 2.52, 2.68, and 2.51, respectively, in the aspheric ablation only group at 6 months; the aspheric ablation group had statistically significantly larger increasing factors (P=.016, P=.038, and P=.027, respectively). The reduction in contrast sensitivity log values was statistically significantly less in the wavefront-guided with aspheric ablation group than in the aspheric ablation only group except at 1.5 cycles per degree. CONCLUSION: The wavefront-guided with aspheric ablation profile was associated with better limitation of HOAs and faster recovery of mesopic contrast sensitivity for patients with a preoperative total HOA RMS lower than 0.30 mu M. (C) 2013 ASCRS and ESCRS
引用
收藏
页码:1059 / 1065
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of simulated keratometric changes following wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized myopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis
    Lee, Wen-Shin
    Manche, Edward E.
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 12 : 613 - 619
  • [42] Comparative Evaluation of Higher-Order Aberrations and Corneal Asphericity Between Wavefront-guided and Aspheric LASIK for Myopia
    Goyal, Jawahar Lal
    Garg, Arushi
    Arora, Ritu
    Jain, Parul
    Goel, Yashpal
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 30 (11) : 777 - U90
  • [43] Wavefront-guided epithelial laser in situ keratomileusis with mitomycin-C for myopia and myopic astigmatism: Flap-on versus flap-off technique
    Ang, Robert Edward T.
    Reyes, Karen B.
    Hernandez, Jo Anne P.
    Tchah, Hungwon
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 37 (06) : 1133 - 1139
  • [44] One-year eye-to-eye comparison of wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis in hyperopes
    Sales, Christopher S.
    Manche, Edward E.
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 8 : 2229 - 2238
  • [45] Two-Year Changes in Corneal Spherical Aberration After Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis and Photorefractive Keratectomy in Regular and Wavefront-Guided Ablations
    Russo, Andrea
    Filini, Ottavia
    Salvalai, Chiara
    Boldini, Alessandro
    Festa, Giulia
    Delcassi, Luisa
    Morescalchi, Francesco
    Semeraro, Francesco
    OPHTHALMOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2021, 10 (04) : 1003 - 1014
  • [46] Induced Higher-order aberrations after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) Performed with Wavefront-Guided IntraLase Femtosecond Laser in moderate to high Astigmatism
    Al-Zeraid, Ferial M.
    Osuagwu, Uchechukwu L.
    BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 16
  • [47] Refractive outcome of wavefront guided laser in situ keratomileusis and wavefront guided photorefractive keratectomy in high pre-existing higher order aberration
    Arora, Ritu
    Goel, Yashpal
    Goyal, Jawahar Lal
    Goyal, Gaurav
    Garg, Arushi
    Jain, Parul
    CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE, 2015, 38 (02) : 127 - 133
  • [48] Comparison of visual performance between conventional LASIK and wavefront-guided LASIK with iris-registration
    Zhang Jing
    Zhou Yue-hua
    Wang Ning-li
    Li Rui
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 121 (02) : 137 - 142
  • [49] Contralateral comparison of wavefront-guided LASIK surgery with iris recognition versus without iris recognition using the MEL80 Excimer laser system
    Wu, Fang
    Yang, Yabo
    Dougherty, Paul J.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2009, 92 (03) : 320 - 327
  • [50] Is Topography-guided Ablation Profile Centered on the Corneal Vertex Better Than Wavefront-guided Ablation Profile Centered on the Entrance Pupil?
    Reinstein, Dan Z.
    Archer, Timothy J.
    Gobbe, Marine
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 28 (02) : 139 - 143