Combined wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis and aspheric ablation profile with iris registration to correct myopia

被引:13
|
作者
Wu, Junshu [3 ]
Zhong, Xingwu [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Bin
Wang, Zheng
Yu, Keming
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Zhongshan Ophthalm Ctr, Hainan Eye Hosp, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, State Key Lab Ophthalmol, Hainan Eye Hosp, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Zhongshan Ophthalm Ctr, State Key Lab Ophthalmol, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
CORNEAL REFRACTIVE SURGERY; HIGHER-ORDER ABERRATIONS; PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; SPHERICAL-ABERRATION; CONTRALATERAL EYE; LASIK; CYCLOTORSION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.01.043
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To compare the effects of a combined wavefront-guided and aspheric ablation profile with an aspheric ablation profile alone to correct myopia in patients with a preoperative total higher-order aberration root mean square (HOA RMS) lower than 0.30 mu m in both eyes. SETTING: Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. DESIGN: Comparative case series. METHODS: Laser in situ keratomileusis was performed, with 1 eye randomized to wavefront-guided with aspheric ablation and the fellow eye to aspheric ablation only. The uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, manifest subjective refraction, corneal topography, RMS value of total and grouped HOAs, and contrast sensitivity were measured preoperatively and 1 and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The study enrolled 62 eyes (31 patients). The increasing factors of total HOA RMS, 3rd-order RMS and 4th-order RMS were 2.09, 2.09, and 1.99, respectively, in the wavefront-guided with aspheric ablation group and 2.52, 2.68, and 2.51, respectively, in the aspheric ablation only group at 6 months; the aspheric ablation group had statistically significantly larger increasing factors (P=.016, P=.038, and P=.027, respectively). The reduction in contrast sensitivity log values was statistically significantly less in the wavefront-guided with aspheric ablation group than in the aspheric ablation only group except at 1.5 cycles per degree. CONCLUSION: The wavefront-guided with aspheric ablation profile was associated with better limitation of HOAs and faster recovery of mesopic contrast sensitivity for patients with a preoperative total HOA RMS lower than 0.30 mu M. (C) 2013 ASCRS and ESCRS
引用
收藏
页码:1059 / 1065
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of optical quality parameters and ocular aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in-situ keratomileusis versus wavefront-guided laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia
    Lee, Kwanghyun
    Ahn, Ji Min
    Kim, Eung Kweon
    Kim, Tae-im
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 251 (09) : 2163 - 2169
  • [2] Iris registration in wavefront-guided LASIK to correct mixed astigmatism
    Khalifa, Mounir
    El-Kateb, Mohamed
    Shaheen, Mohamed Shafik
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 35 (03) : 433 - 437
  • [3] Visual Performance after Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation and Wavefront-Guided Laser In Situ Keratomileusis for High Myopia
    Igarashi, Akihito
    Kamiya, Kazutaka
    Shimizu, Kimiya
    Komatsu, Mari
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 148 (01) : 164 - 170
  • [4] Outcomes of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia
    Keir, Nancy J.
    Simpson, Trefford
    Hutchings, Natalie
    Jones, Lyndon
    Fonn, Desmond
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 37 (05) : 886 - 893
  • [5] Photorefractive keratectomy combined with corneal wavefront-guided and hyperaspheric ablation profiles to correct myopia
    Lee, Hun
    Park, Si Yoon
    Kang, David Sung Yong
    Ha, Byoung Jin
    Choi, Jin Young
    Kim, Eung Kweon
    Seo, Kyoung Yul
    Kim, Tae-im
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 42 (06) : 890 - 898
  • [6] Aspheric profile versus wavefront-guided ablation photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of myopia using the Allegretto Eye Q
    Ghoreishi, Seyyed Mohammad
    Naderibeni, Afsaneh
    Peyman, Alireza
    Rismanchian, Akram
    Eslami, Fatemeh
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 19 (04) : 544 - 553
  • [7] Wavefront-Guided Ablation Retreatment Using Iris Registration
    Mohamed, Engy M.
    Muftuoglu, Orkun
    Bowman, Wayne
    Cavanagh, H. Dwight
    Mootha, Vinod V.
    Radwan, Gamal A.
    McCulley, James P.
    EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2010, 36 (01): : 54 - 59
  • [8] Comparison of optical quality parameters and ocular aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in-situ keratomileusis versus wavefront-guided laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia
    Kwanghyun Lee
    Ji Min Ahn
    Eung Kweon Kim
    Tae-im Kim
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2013, 251 : 2163 - 2169
  • [9] Wavefront-Guided Versus Wavefront-Optimized Laser in situ Keratomileusis for Patients With Myopia: A Prospective Randomized Contra lateral Eye Study
    He, Lingmin
    Liu, Anthony
    Manche, Edward E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 157 (06) : 1170 - 1178
  • [10] Visual outcomes after wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: Prospective comparison
    Moshirfar, Majid
    Schliesser, Joshua A.
    Chang, Joann C.
    Oberg, Thomas J.
    Mifflin, Mark D.
    Townley, Richard
    Livingston, Myrna K.
    Kurz, Christopher J.
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 36 (08) : 1336 - 1343