Experiential avoidance, self-compassion, self-judgment and coping styles in infertility

被引:26
作者
Cunha, Marina [1 ,2 ]
Galhardo, Ana [1 ,2 ]
Pinto-Gouveia, Jose [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Super Miguel Torga, Largo Cruz de Celas 1, P-3000132 Coimbra, Portugal
[2] Univ Coimbra, CINEICC, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Rua Colegio Novo, P-3001802 Coimbra, Portugal
关键词
Infertility; Psychological inflexibility/experiential avoidance; Self-compassion; Self-judgment; Coping styles; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; EMOTION REGULATION; WOMEN; DISTRESS; PSYCHOPATHOLOGY; VALIDATION; ACCEPTANCE; DEPRESSION; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.srhc.2016.04.001
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study sought out to explore the existence of differences regarding emotion regulation processes (psychological inflexibility/experiential avoidance, self-judgment and self-compassion) and coping styles (emotional/detached, avoidant and rational) in three different groups of couples: 120 fertile couples (FG), 147 couples with an infertility diagnosis who were pursuing medical treatment for their fertility problem(s) (IG), and 59 couples with infertility applying for adoption (AG). Study design: Cross-sectional survey, using the couple as unit of analysis. Main outcome measures: Participants filled in paper-pencil questionnaires assessing coping styles, psychological inflexibility/experiential avoidance, self-judgment and self-compassion. Results: IG couples, and particularly women, tend to use more experiential avoidance and self judgment mechanisms and less emotional/detached coping style. When compared to FG couples, IG and AG couples tend to apply more avoidant coping strategies. AG couples showed higher self-compassion. Conclusions: Findings suggest that emotion regulation processes may be an important target in psychological interventions for patients dealing with infertility and with the demands of medical treatment. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 47
页数:7
相关论文
共 56 条