Validation of Large-Eddy Simulation Methods for Gravity Wave Breaking

被引:7
|
作者
Remmler, Sebastian [1 ]
Hickel, Stefan [1 ]
Fruman, Mark D. [2 ]
Achatz, Ulrich [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Inst Aerodynam & Fluid Mech, D-80290 Munich, Germany
[2] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Inst Atmosphere & Environm, D-60054 Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
PART I; GENERAL-CIRCULATION; MIDDLE ATMOSPHERE; INSTABILITY DYNAMICS; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; DIMENSIONS; TURBULENCE; EVOLUTION; PARAMETERIZATION; DRAG;
D O I
10.1175/JAS-D-14-0321.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
To reduce the computational costs of numerical studies of gravity wave breaking in the atmosphere, the grid resolution has to be reduced as much as possible. Insufficient resolution of small-scale turbulence demands a proper turbulence parameterization in the framework of a large-eddy simulation (LES). The authors validate three different LES methods-the adaptive local deconvolution method (ALDM), the dynamic Smagorinsky method (DSM), and a naive central discretization without turbulence parameterization (CDS4)-for three different cases of the breaking of well-defined monochromatic gravity waves. For ALDM, a modification of the numerical flux functions is developed that significantly improves the simulation results in the case of a temporarily very smooth velocity field. The test cases include an unstable and a stable inertia-gravity wave as well as an unstable high-frequency gravity wave. All simulations are carried out both in three-dimensional domains and in two-dimensional domains in which the velocity and vorticity fields are three-dimensional (so-called 2.5D simulations). The results obtained with ALDM and DSM are generally in good agreement with the reference direct numerical simulations as long as the resolution in the direction of the wave vector is sufficiently high. The resolution in the other directions has a weaker influence on the results. The simulations without turbulence parameterization are only successful if the resolution is high and the level of turbulence is comparatively low.
引用
收藏
页码:3537 / 3562
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Breakdown of continuity in large-eddy simulation
    Langford, JA
    Moser, RD
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2001, 13 (05) : 1524 - 1527
  • [32] Commutator errors in large-eddy simulation
    Geurts, BJ
    Holm, DD
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS A-MATHEMATICAL AND GENERAL, 2006, 39 (09): : 2213 - 2229
  • [33] Large-eddy simulation of turbulent combustion
    Pitsch, H
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2006, 38 : 453 - 482
  • [34] Large-eddy simulation: achievements and challenges
    Piomelli, U
    PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 1999, 35 (04) : 335 - 362
  • [35] Large-Eddy Simulation of Subsonic Jets
    Vuorinen, Ville
    Wehrfritz, Armin
    Yu, Jingzhou
    Kaario, Ossi
    Larmi, Martti
    Boersma, Bendiks Jan
    13TH EUROPEAN TURBULENCE CONFERENCE (ETC13): INSTABILITY, TRANSITION, GRID TURBULENCE AND JETS, 2011, 318
  • [36] Large-Eddy Simulation of transcritical flows
    Schmitt, T.
    Selle, L.
    Cuenot, B.
    Poinsot, T.
    COMPTES RENDUS MECANIQUE, 2009, 337 (6-7): : 528 - 538
  • [37] Large-Eddy Simulation Of Radiation Fog
    Mikio Nakanishi
    Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2000, 94 : 461 - 493
  • [38] Large-eddy simulation without filter
    Knaepen, B
    Debliquy, O
    Carati, D
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2005, 205 (01) : 98 - 107
  • [39] Large-Eddy Simulation of Supersonic Jet Noise with Discontinuous Galerkin Methods
    Chauhan, Monika
    Massa, Luca
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2022, 60 (03) : 1451 - 1470
  • [40] Large-eddy simulation: How large is large enough?
    de Roode, SR
    Duynkerke, PG
    Jonker, HJJ
    JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2004, 61 (04) : 403 - 421