Validation of Large-Eddy Simulation Methods for Gravity Wave Breaking

被引:7
|
作者
Remmler, Sebastian [1 ]
Hickel, Stefan [1 ]
Fruman, Mark D. [2 ]
Achatz, Ulrich [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Inst Aerodynam & Fluid Mech, D-80290 Munich, Germany
[2] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Inst Atmosphere & Environm, D-60054 Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
PART I; GENERAL-CIRCULATION; MIDDLE ATMOSPHERE; INSTABILITY DYNAMICS; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; DIMENSIONS; TURBULENCE; EVOLUTION; PARAMETERIZATION; DRAG;
D O I
10.1175/JAS-D-14-0321.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
To reduce the computational costs of numerical studies of gravity wave breaking in the atmosphere, the grid resolution has to be reduced as much as possible. Insufficient resolution of small-scale turbulence demands a proper turbulence parameterization in the framework of a large-eddy simulation (LES). The authors validate three different LES methods-the adaptive local deconvolution method (ALDM), the dynamic Smagorinsky method (DSM), and a naive central discretization without turbulence parameterization (CDS4)-for three different cases of the breaking of well-defined monochromatic gravity waves. For ALDM, a modification of the numerical flux functions is developed that significantly improves the simulation results in the case of a temporarily very smooth velocity field. The test cases include an unstable and a stable inertia-gravity wave as well as an unstable high-frequency gravity wave. All simulations are carried out both in three-dimensional domains and in two-dimensional domains in which the velocity and vorticity fields are three-dimensional (so-called 2.5D simulations). The results obtained with ALDM and DSM are generally in good agreement with the reference direct numerical simulations as long as the resolution in the direction of the wave vector is sufficiently high. The resolution in the other directions has a weaker influence on the results. The simulations without turbulence parameterization are only successful if the resolution is high and the level of turbulence is comparatively low.
引用
收藏
页码:3537 / 3562
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Large-eddy simulation (LES) of large hydrocyclones
    Delgadillo, Jose A.
    Rajamani, Raj K.
    PARTICULATE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 25 (03) : 227 - 245
  • [22] Large-eddy simulation of wave-breaking induced turbulent coherent structures and suspended sediment transport on a barred beach
    Zhou, Zheyu
    Hsu, Tian-Jian
    Cox, Daniel
    Liu, Xiaofeng
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2017, 122 (01) : 207 - 235
  • [23] Large-eddy simulation of cumulus clouds
    Matheou, Georgios
    PHYSICAL REVIEW FLUIDS, 2022, 7 (11)
  • [24] Large-Eddy Simulation of Windbreak Flow
    Edward G. Patton
    Roger H. Shaw
    Murray J. Judd
    Michael R. Raupach
    Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1998, 87 : 275 - 307
  • [25] Inverse modeling for large-eddy simulation
    Geurts, BJ
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 1997, 9 (12) : 3585 - 3587
  • [26] Large-eddy simulation of a jet in a crossflow
    Guo, Xuyao
    Meinke, Matthias
    Schroeder, Wolfgang
    Direct and Large-Eddy Simulation V, Proceedings, 2004, 9 : 603 - 610
  • [27] Nonlinear regularization for large-eddy simulation
    Geurts, Bernard J.
    Holm, Darryl D.
    Direct and Large-Eddy Simulation V, Proceedings, 2004, 9 : 5 - 14
  • [28] Large-eddy simulation of windbreak flow
    Patton, EG
    Shaw, RH
    Judd, MJ
    Raupach, MR
    BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 1998, 87 (02) : 275 - 306
  • [29] Regularization modeling for large-eddy simulation
    Geurts, BJ
    Holm, DD
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2003, 15 (01) : L13 - L16
  • [30] Large-eddy simulation of downslope flows
    Skyllingstad, ED
    10TH CONFERENCE ON MOUNTAIN METEOROLOGY, 2002, : 97 - 100