Mainstream smoke chemistry analysis of samples from the 2009 US cigarette market

被引:53
作者
Bodnar, J. A. [1 ]
Morgan, W. T. [1 ]
Murphy, P. A.
Ogden, M. W.
机构
[1] RJ Reynolds Tobacco Co, Bowman Gray Tech Ctr, Winston Salem, NC 27102 USA
关键词
Survey; Cigarette; Mainstream smoke constituent; US market; REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE; MUTAGENICITY; K1R4F;
D O I
10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.05.011
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
A survey of selected mainstream smoke constituents from commercially marketed US cigarettes was conducted in 2009. The US cigarette market was segmented into thirteen (13) strata based on Cambridge Filter Method (CFM) "tar" category and cigarette design parameters. Menthol and non-menthol cigarettes were included. Sixty-one (61) cigarette brand styles were chosen to represent the market. Another thirty-four (34) brand styles of interest were included in the survey along with a Kentucky 3R4F reference cigarette. Twenty mainstream smoke constituents were evaluated using the Health Canada smoking regimen. By weighting the results of the 61 brand styles using the number of brand styles represented by each stratum, the mainstream smoke constituent means and medians of the US cigarette market were estimated. For nicotine, catechol, hydroquinone, benzo(a)pyrene and formaldehyde the mean yields increased with increasing "tar" yields. Constituent yields for the ultra-low "tar" and low "tar" cigarettes were not significantly different for most other analytes as ventilation blocking defeated any filter air dilution design features. In contrast, normalization per mg nicotine provided an inverse ranking of cigarette yields per CFM "tar" categories. Menthol cigarette mean constituent yields were observed to be within the range of the non-menthol cigarettes of similar "tar" categories. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 42
页数:8
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO824342006
[2]   A comparison of the mainstream smoke chemistry and mutagenicity of a representative sample of the US cigarette market with two Kentucky reference cigarettes (K1R4F and K1R5F) [J].
Chepiga, TA ;
Morton, MJ ;
Murphy, PA ;
Avalos, JT ;
Bombick, BR ;
Doolittle, DJ ;
Borgerding, MF ;
Swauger, JE .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2000, 38 (10) :949-962
[3]   Smoke composition and predicting relationships for international commercial cigarettes smoked with three machine-smoking conditions [J].
Counts, ME ;
Morton, MJ ;
Laffoon, SW ;
Cox, RH ;
Lipowicz, PJ .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 41 (03) :185-227
[4]  
DeBethizy J., 1998, USE SHORT TERM TESTS
[5]   Constituents in tobacco and smoke emissions from Canadian cigarettes [J].
Hammond, D. ;
O'Connor, R. J. .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 2008, 17 :I24-I31
[6]   An international literature survey of "IARC Group I carcinogens" reported in mainstream cigarette smoke [J].
Smith, CJ ;
Livingston, SD ;
Doolittle, DJ .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1997, 35 (10-11) :1107-1130
[7]   A COMPARISON OF THE MUTAGENICITY OF MAINSTREAM CIGARETTE-SMOKE CONDENSATES FROM A REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE OF THE US CIGARETTE MARKET WITH A KENTUCKY REFERENCE CIGARETTE (K1R4F) [J].
STEELE, RH ;
PAYNE, VM ;
FULP, CW ;
REES, DC ;
LEE, CK ;
DOOLITTLE, DJ .
MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY, 1995, 342 (3-4) :179-190
[8]   An analysis of the mainstream smoke chemistry of samples of the US cigarette market acquired between 1995 and 2000 [J].
Swauger, JE ;
Steichen, TJ ;
Murphy, PA ;
Kinsler, S .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 35 (02) :142-156
[9]  
WHO, 2008, WHO TECH REP SER, V951, P1
[10]  
[No title captured]