Rectal dose to prostate cancer patients treated with proton therapy with or without rectal spacer

被引:14
作者
Chung, Heeteak [1 ]
Polf, Jerimy [1 ]
Badiyan, Shahed [1 ]
Biagioli, Matthew [2 ]
Fernandez, Daniel [3 ]
Latifi, Kujtim [3 ]
Wilder, Richard [3 ]
Mehta, Minesh [1 ]
Chuong, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Baltimore Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Florida Hosp, Inst Canc, Dept Radiat Oncol, Orlando, FL USA
[3] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Tampa, FL USA
关键词
proton beam scanning; prostate cancer; rectal spacers; MODULATED RADIATION-THERAPY; POLYETHYLENE-GLYCOL HYDROGEL; EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION; ESCALATION TRIAL; TOXICITY; OUTCOMES; IMRT;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.12001
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a spacer inserted in the prerectal space could reduce modeled rectal dose and toxicity rates for patients with prostate cancer treated in silico with pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy. A total of 20 patients were included in this study who received photon therapy (12 with rectal spacer (DuraSeal gel) and 8 without). Two PBS treatment plans were retrospectively created for each patient using the following beam arrangements: (1) lateral-opposed (LAT) fields and (2) left and right anterior oblique (LAO/RAO) fields. Dose volume histograms (DVH) were generated for the prostate, rectum, bladder, and right and left femoral heads. The normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for grade 2 rectal toxicity was calculated using the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman model and compared between patients with and without the rectal spacer. A significantly lower mean rectal DVH was achieved in patients with rectal spacer compared to those without. For LAT plans, the mean rectal V70 with and without rectal spacer was 4.19 and 13.5%, respectively. For LAO/RAO plans, the mean rectal V70 with and without rectal spacer was 5.07 and 13.5%, respectively. No significant differences were found in any rectal dosimetric parameters between the LAT and the LAO/RAO plans generated with the rectal spacers. We found that 9mm space resulted in a significant decrease in NTCP modeled for grade 2 rectal toxicity. Rectal spacers can significantly decrease modeled rectal dose and predicted grade 2 rectal toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated in silico with PBS. A minimum of 9mm separation between the prostate and anterior rectal wall yields the largest benefit.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 39
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   DOSE ESCALATION AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER TREATED WITH RADIOTHERAPY: LONG-TERM RESULTS OF THE DUTCH RANDOMIZED DOSE-ESCALATION TRIAL (CKTO 96-10 TRIAL) [J].
Al-Mamgani, Abrahim ;
van Putten, Wim L. J. ;
van der Wielen, Gerard J. ;
Levendag, Peter C. ;
Incrocci, Luca .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 79 (04) :1004-1012
[3]   Improved Beam Angle Arrangement in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Treatment Planning for Localized Prostate Cancer [J].
Cao, Wenhua ;
Lim, Gino J. ;
Li, Yupeng ;
Zhu, X. Ronald ;
Zhang, Xiaodong .
CANCERS, 2015, 7 (02) :574-584
[4]   The effect of anterior proton beams in the setting of a prostate-rectum spacer [J].
Christodouleas, John P. ;
Tang, Shikui ;
Susil, Robert C. ;
McNutt, Todd R. ;
Song, Danny Y. ;
Bekelman, Justin ;
Deville, Curtiland ;
Vapiwala, Neha ;
DeWeese, Theodore L. ;
Lu, Hsiao-Ming ;
Both, Stefan .
MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2013, 38 (03) :315-319
[5]   Rectal Toxicity After Proton Therapy For Prostate Cancer: An Analysis of Outcomes of Prospective Studies Conducted at the University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute [J].
Colaco, Rovel J. ;
Hoppe, Bradford S. ;
Flampouri, Stella ;
McKibben, Brian T. ;
Henderson, Randal H. ;
Bryant, Curtis ;
Nichols, Romaine C. ;
Mendenhall, William M. ;
Li, Zuofeng ;
Su, Zhong ;
Morris, Christopher G. ;
Mendenhall, Nancy P. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 91 (01) :172-181
[6]   Anterior-oriented proton beams for prostate cancer: A multi-institutional experience [J].
Cuaron, John J. ;
Harris, Alexander A. ;
Chon, Brian ;
Tsai, Henry ;
Larson, Gary ;
Hartsell, William F. ;
Hug, Eugen ;
Cahlon, Oren .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2015, 54 (06) :868-874
[7]   The Association of Long-term Treatment-related Side Effects With Cancer-specific and General Quality of Life Among Prostate Cancer Survivors [J].
Davis, Kimberly M. ;
Kelly, Scott P. ;
Luta, George ;
Tomko, Catherine ;
Miller, Anthony B. ;
Taylor, Kathryn L. .
UROLOGY, 2014, 84 (02) :300-306
[8]   Escalated-dose versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: first results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial [J].
Dearnaley, David P. ;
Sydes, Matthew R. ;
Graham, John D. ;
Aird, Edwin G. ;
Bottomley, David ;
Cowan, Richard A. ;
Huddart, Robert A. ;
Jose, Chakiath C. ;
Matthews, John H. L. ;
Millar, Jeremy ;
Moore, A. Rollo ;
Morgan, Rachel C. ;
Russell, J. Martin ;
Scrase, Christopher D. ;
Stephens, Richard J. ;
Syndikus, Isabel ;
Parmar, Mahesh K. B. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2007, 8 (06) :475-487
[9]   A Case-Matched Study of Toxicity Outcomes After Proton Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer [J].
Fang, Penny ;
Mick, Rosemarie ;
Deville, Curtiland ;
Both, Stefan ;
Bekelman, Justin E. ;
Christodouleas, John P. ;
Guzzo, Thomas J. ;
Tochner, Zelig ;
Hahn, Stephen M. ;
Vapiwala, Neha .
CANCER, 2015, 121 (07) :1118-1127
[10]   Long-term results of the Dutch randomized prostate cancer trial: Impact of dose-escalation on local, biochemical, clinical failure, and survival [J].
Heemsbergen, Wilma D. ;
Al-Mamgani, Abrahim ;
Slot, Annerie ;
Dielwart, Michel F. H. ;
Lebesque, Joos V. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 110 (01) :104-109